2000-366 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4W SIRWMD Alternative Water Supplies Construction Cost Sharing Application Fore 2000.2001 EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 4. Is the project in an area identified by the SJRWMD Water Supply Assessment as a priority water resource; caution arema or a delineated ansa`?'Ileis will be determined for you by SJRWMD staff. 0-5 points. Yes. Inside caution area = 5; Yes, Inside delincalvel area a 3; No. Outside caution area andlor defineared area = 0. 5- Projected schedule Projected starting date: mo. Jrine yr. 2001 . Completion date: mo. _lanuaa_ yr. - 2002 (Funds received through this program may be used only for projects constructed atter a cost sharing contract has been executed and may not be used to reimburse the cost of existing structures or structures alnWy underconstruction. Cost sharing contracts probably will be executed in April or May 2001). 6. Will water from this project directly take the place; of an existing or proposed withdrawal from a higher quality watcrsource?......................_..........................._.............. Yes ko No If yes, identify the source and quantity of higher quality water to be replaced. Floridan aquifer ........... yes 11+ no _ 13.14^ million gallons per e r Surficial aquifer ............. yes , no -million gallonsep r year Surface water .............. yes no W million gallonseg r year If surface; water, state name of water body EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 6. Will water from this project directly and effectively take the place of an existing or proposed higher quality water source? 0-20 points. Based on raler's assessment nj' the G(]ecliveness of the project at saving potable water and apparent relative cost effectiveness. Because of the great variation in types ol'prujects. calculations of'cosi ejjeetiveness for widely dissimilar projects. such as urban reuse and agricidlirral freeze prolec•lion ponds will not be crrm1wred. 7. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply, such as improving or protecting ,ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? Yes Ys_ No If yes, then describe benefits`? You may add one page atlachmcnt behind this page if necessary. Mixing R.O. cong4c nttate water with reclaimed water will result in a opt reduction oIF approximately 36,000 -GPD less conce:ntratc beintt released to the Indian Ifiver. EVALUATION FACTOR related to question 7. Does the project provide other water resource benefits in addition to water supply,. such as improving or protecting ground or surface water quality, increasing recharge or conserving water? 0-10 points. Based on raler`s assessment q/'rhe extent aml signs frcance rYfadditional benefits. RageA - a 'illFi#\1ia5N.7C�l�Y1M'I iILIi Y-G'i.illi}a;7M1'ftiya�.I:W,I'euaa��.iame'MMr.nwrt rl.�i)•A� �Wr indr'�rLasr SWMSIAW aMswswr]I �IIpµN.a,�lar!Ji wi! Ilad_l wr 6s