Laserfiche WebLink
pity muitt, and coordination of the work. Permitting issues regarding reaming activities with the <br />St. Johns River Water Management District are also included. <br />Task 3.0 Monitor Contractor Progress <br />lite Engineer will provide a qualified Resident Project Representative (RPR) to observe the <br />contractor's progress and to determine, in general, if lite contractors executed work is being <br />done in accordance with the contract documents. in addition, the RPR will be on-site to describe <br />the lithology encountered, observe reaming operations, and monitor development activities. It <br />is anticipated that the RPR will be onsite 70 percent of the time when well construction activities <br />are occurring. In the event the contractor is late in completing; thu required work, the Engineer <br />may require additional compensation for additional time -dependent services which may be <br />required. CDM anticipates that it will take a contractor Gil days to substantially complete this <br />project. <br />Task 4.0 Flowmeter Evaluation <br />The Engineer will evaluate proposed replacement flowmeters for Well Nos, 1, 2, and 3 at the <br />South County Water Treatment Plant. Included in this task is assessing the condition of the <br />existing meters, flowmeter alternatives and options, and evaluating perfeirmance characteristics <br />of the proposed flowmeters. _ <br />Task 5.0 rump Bearing [Wplacement <br />Services associated with the previous workauthoriration included inspection of well pump <br />bearings. The pumps at Well Nos. 7 through 4 are no longer manufactured and rephicement <br />parts are not available. The well rehabilitation contractor had to have the replacement bearings <br />specially made. Replacement costs total approximately $32,000. Contingency Services in the <br />previous work authorization accounted for $25,040 of the cast. Tile remainder is included in the <br />outside professional crisis. <br />Contingency Services <br />The pump and column of Well No -4 were idontified as being; slack during fieldwork associated <br />With a previous work authorization. It is unknown how much effort will be requirutl to remove <br />the pump and column at Well No. 4. he condition of the well is also unknown, so it is <br />indeterminate if Well No. 4 requires reaming. The County has directed the Engineer to make an <br />attempt to remove the pump and column at Well No. 4. To cover the potential costs of pump <br />and column ren°roval and the reaming of Well No. 4, a Contingency Services allowance is <br />provided for in thie, proposal. Activities designated under this allowance of 20% of the total <br />amount will be performed only after receiving formal approval by Utilities Department <br />personnel. Well No. 4 or the pump may become damaged as a consequence of the removal of <br />tine pump and column. if this occurs, repair to the well and/or the pump could exceed the <br />contingency funds that have been set aside. <br />TW398.d" B-2 <br />