My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/22/2024 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2024
>
08/22/2024 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 3:08:20 PM
Creation date
10/15/2024 3:07:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/22/2024
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Utility Rate Study Workshop
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final August 22, 2024 <br />4) Commit to more frequent, periodic future reviews of the rate structure. <br />5) Incorporate long-term utility master plan assumptions into future rate studies. <br />5. BOARD COMMENTS/ QUESTIONS <br />The Board discussed the rate study and recommendations in relation to the potential <br />growth of new subdivisions/developments and commercial buildings with Mr. <br />Burnham and Mr. Lieske and how that would affect the recommendations. Mr. <br />Burnham noted that one of the forecast's assumptions was based on historical growth. <br />It was assumed there would be about 1,250 new equivalent residential units each year <br />on the water side and, 1,350 new units on the sewer side, considering the gradual <br />transition from septic to sewer over time. The forecast factored in a little over 2% <br />growth rate on sewer and almost 2% on water, which would lead to revenue growth. <br />Further discussion was had regarding the grant funding for septic -to -sewer <br />conversions. A significant amount of grant funding was available for this program, <br />which would be factored into the process in more detail. It was important to note that <br />grants did not cover the full cost, so the utility would need to cover additional <br />expenses using other funding sources, as accounted for in the financial modeling. <br />6. PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Sebastian resident Jannet Perry asked why her utility bill was being processed in <br />Birmingham, Alabama, instead of in Indian River County or Florida. Brian Beavers, <br />Utilities Finance Manager, explained that banks have consolidated into regional areas <br />and use lockbox processing, where paper checks are processed at a central location. <br />Mr. Beavers understood the preference for keeping the transactions in Florida. <br />Bob Gallagher, a resident of Oak Harbor, stated he had moved to Indian River <br />County from South Florida eight years ago. He was surprised that his water bill in <br />Indian River County was lower than in Miami -Dade County. However, after learning <br />that the bill was monthly instead of quarterly, he discovered that the overall cost was <br />higher. This made him question the efficiency of the water and waste utility operation <br />in Indian River County. <br />Judy Orcutt, President of the Clean Water Coalition (CWC), expressed concern <br />about the study's lack of a significant plan or transmission expansion process. She <br />stated that the current rate increase was simply catching the County up. She <br />appreciated the promise of an integrated master plan and a review of the rates. She <br />worried that the need for rate increases might be even greater a year from now, <br />particularly as the St. Johns River Water Management District had indicated that <br />groundwater was being depleted. She also questioned whether there had been any <br />discussion about "toilet to tap" as a potential water source. Ms. Orcutt highlighted the <br />Indian River County Florida Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.