10/15/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Boas 99 430 Under discussion, Commissioner Eggert stated she was reconsidering her second on the motion because she felt we do owe a vote on this application. However, she did wish we had an answer to why this was brought to us in such a rush. Chairman Adams believed it gives an appearance there is something else involved. She preferred to put it off because she could not support it as it stands. Director Keating made the following points: 1) the applicant changed the location at staff's suggestion; 2) staff had missed the advertising for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting by one day and it had to be readvertised; 3) the applicant should not be penalized for staff's failure to include the Cox letter in with today's backup. Chairman Adams felt that still doesn't excuse the back up material not being provided because it gives a bad appearance. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion failed by a 2-3 vote, Commissioners Bird, Macht and Tippin voting in dissent. MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Bird, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, to approve staff's recommendation with the criteria outlined. Under discussion, Commissioner Macht suggested the Motion include the condition that no unreasonable requirements will be imposed on a corollary user. COMMISSIONERS BIRD AND TIPPIN AGREED TO ADD THE CONDITION TO THEIR MOTION. THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. The Motion passed by a 4-1 vote, Chairman Adams dissenting. MOTION WAS MADE by Chairman Adams, SECONDED by Commissioner Tippin, that the Board not consider any further towers until workshops have been held and we have a tower plan. Under discussion, Chairman Adams stated she was not very comfortable in giving up any kind of responsibility the Commission has in issuing special exemptions or administrative use approval or anything else for the towers. It is the Board's responsibility and 32 OCTOBER 15, 1996