10/30/2024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final October 30, 2024 Joseph Paladin, Chairman of the Urban Services Awareness Committee, highlighted the importance of prioritizing quality over quantity in managing growth for the Indian River Neighborhood Association. He suggested that the County implement phased growth by breaking it down into four or five phases for better infrastructure management rather than extending the urban service line beyond I-95. Mr. Paladin noted that developer agreements could ensure developments were financially self-sufficient, requiring developers to cover infrastructure costs and pay impact fees. However, while impact fees could fund facilities like fire stations and schools, they do not cover ongoing salaries for firefighters or teachers, which was an important distinction to remember. The Chairman called for a recess at 4:07 pm and reconvened the meeting at 4:25 pm with all members present. Fly in Ranches Homeowners President Tom Cowen stated his community was opposed to expanding west of I-95 beyond the USB. After 35 years in the County, the residents did not want their airstrip threatened by nearby development. He noted that Vero Beach and Indian River County were unique in terms of its agricultural land and open space, and he feared that westward expansion would lead to unchecked growth. In response to Chairman Adams, Mr. Balter stated that the timeline to include a recommendation for the Oslo corridor or Route 60 in the Comprehensive Plan and incorporating the Evaluation Appraisal Report (EAR) based amendments would be October 1, 2025. He noted that it was best to submit all amendments together, as the state reviewed the Comprehensive Plan each time changes were submitted. The reviewers could suggest restrictions or modifications with each update. The five recommendations were further discussed between the Board and staff in the following order. Recommendation 4: Addressed 15 bisected properties where the USB was drawn through the center. The boundary should be adjusted to include the entire property. The primary concern was that most of these properties were located on the eastern side, which may lack effective alternatives. It was important to avoid sacrificing someone's livelihood or housing affordability for the sake of expansion and growth. Staff was requested to provide a detailed list, an initial policy, and a map that included the bisected properties within the USB. Recommendation 1: Addressed the proposed targeted USB expansion; the Board discussed conducting a specific analysis in the corridor to evaluate industrial versus Indian River County Florida Page 6