Laserfiche WebLink
Alternative Commodities or Services available to the State via outside contract <br />Contract Source vehicle. A copy of the executed contract shall be submitted along with <br />additional quotes if GSA 70 or GSA 84. <br />Formal Competitive Solicitations: $35,000 and above and not available on STC include <br />Invitation to Bid (ITB), Request for Proposal (RFP), or Invitation to Negotiate (ITN). Each <br />requires a Scope of Work that meets all statutory requirements and formal posting or publication <br />processes. Subrecipients shall submit their formal solicitation documentation and <br />subsequent vendor selection documentation for approval prior to initiating any work. <br />The Division shall review the solicitation and provide comments, if any, to the Sub -Recipient. <br />Consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.325, the Division shall review the solicitation for compliance with <br />the procurement standards outlined in 2 C.F.R. § 200.318 through 200.327 as well as Appendix II <br />to 2 C.F.R. Part 200. Consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.318(k), the Division shall not substitute its <br />judgment for that of the Sub -Recipient. While the Sub -Recipient does not need the approval of <br />the Division in order to publish a competitive solicitation, this review may allow the Division to <br />identify deficiencies in the vendor requirements or in the commodity or service specifications. <br />The Division's review and comments shall not constitute an approval of the solicitation. <br />Regardless of the Division's review, the Sub -Recipient remains bound by all applicable laws, <br />regulations, and agreement terms. If during its review the Division identifies any deficiencies, <br />then the Division shall communicate those deficiencies to the Sub -Recipient as quickly as <br />possible. <br />If the Sub -Recipient publishes a competitive solicitation after receiving comments from the <br />Division that the solicitation is deficient, then the Division may: <br />• Terminate this Agreement in accordance with the provisions outlined in paragraph <br />(17) above; and, <br />• Refuse to reimburse the Sub -Recipient for any costs associated with that <br />solicitation. <br />Examples of when to use each method: <br />Invitation to Bid: Procurement by sealed bidding is a method where bids are publicly solicited <br />through formal advertising. It is when a Sub -Recipient can establish precise specifications for a <br />commodity or service defining, with specificity, as further outlined in the scope of work. <br />Under this procurement method, the solicitation document used is known as the ITB. Sealed <br />bidding is often utilized when the Sub -Recipient's requirements are known and specific in detail <br />The sealed bid method is the preferred method for procuring construction services and is <br />appropriate when the following conditions are present: <br />• Complete, adequate, and realistic specifications or purchase descriptions are <br />available; <br />• Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the <br />business; <br />The Sub -Recipient primarily selects the successful bidder based on price. This includes the price - <br />related factors included within the solicitation. Other than the responsibility determination, the <br />Sub -Recipient shall not select a contractor on the basis of non -price -related factors. <br />50 <br />