Laserfiche WebLink
Ladder 14 Justification for Replacement Memo <br />Aerial Ladder Design and Structural Integrity: <br />The lightweight design of the 2018 Pierce Enforcer with Ascendant 107' aerial has resulted in <br />Lower load-bearing capacity and stability issues. These concerns have been present since <br />day one. <br />A large crack was discovered in the framework of the lower telescopic fly section of the <br />Ladder after a major structure fire, leading to necessary repairs. Though the damage was <br />deemed warranty -related, it raises doubts about the overall structural integrity of the aerial. <br />Electronic Control and Waterway Monitor Failures: <br />The waterway monitor has experienced frequent failures, with issues such as <br />miscalibrations and electronic malfunctions. <br />The elevation motor was replaced after a water intrusion issue during a structure fire, only <br />for the same problem to recur shortly after the apparatus was returned to service. <br />The monitor's malfunctioning has caused significant downtime and repair costs, including a <br />repair bill of $12,000 for replacing the elevation motor and backup hydraulic control. <br />The possibility of requiring a full replacement of the monitor, with a cost of over $17,000, <br />further compounds the financial strain. <br />Ongoing Reliability Concerns: <br />The apparatus has accumulated over 71,000 miles and 5,400 hours of run time. For <br />perspective, if the engine hours were converted to miles driven, the odometer would read <br />approximately 270,000 miles. While the powertrain and chassis have shown reliability, the <br />aerial ladder's repeated electronic and structural failures suggest potential longer-term <br />risks. <br />Considering that the production time on the new tower would take three years, we could <br />conservatively calculate the numbers to exceed 100,000 miles and 8,000 hours, if the <br />apparatus is certifiable for that long. The department suggests it maybe prudent to place an <br />order for a replacement sooner rather than later to avoid further extensive repair costs and <br />unexpected downtime. <br />In conclusion, the department faces an ongoing challenge with the current aerial ladder and <br />its associated systems. Despite the apparatus' solid powertrain performance, the recurring <br />issues with the ladder and monitor system, combined with concerns about the structural <br />integrity of the aerial, raise serious questions aboutthe apparatus' continued viability. Given <br />the potential costs for repairs and the lead time for a replacement, it is recommended to <br />start planning for a new unit to ensure the reliability and safety of the department's Fire <br />Rescue fleet for the future. <br />46 <br />