My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2025-070
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2020's
>
2025
>
2025-070
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2025 10:05:37 AM
Creation date
4/24/2025 10:05:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Work Order
Approved Date
03/25/2025
Control Number
2025-070
Agenda Item Number
9.P
Entity Name
Coastal Technology Corporation
Subject
Work Order No. 2018007-5 for Sector 7 (Porpoise Point) and Dune Restoration
Project Alternatives Assessment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Indian River County Work Order Number 2018007-5 <br /> Sector 7 Beach and Dune Restoration Project Exhibit 1 - Scope of Work <br /> A TRUE COPY <br /> Exhibit 1 -Scope of Work CERTIFICATION ON LAST PAGE <br /> RYAN! !. BUTLER, CLERK <br /> Sector 7 Alternatives Assessment <br /> Introduction:The County's Sector 7 Beach Restoration Project was initially constructed in 2007.The <br /> initial Project included placement of about 360,000 cubic yards of sand from the County's offshore <br /> borrow area to partially restore over about 2.2 miles of beach.The initial Project area: <br /> • was authorized by permits issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection <br /> (FDEP) and the U. S.Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), and <br /> • extended from FDEP reference monuments R-97 to R-108. <br /> Since the initial 2007 construction, Sector 7 beaches have eroded and been damaged by numerous <br /> hurricanes and storms. Re-nourishment of Sector 7 beaches from R-97 to R-108: <br /> • was authorized by the COUNTY for design, monitoring, permitting, and solicitation of bids; <br /> • however, bids were rejected by the County due to the refusal of multiple property owners- <br /> mostly in the northern "feeder beach" portion of the Project Area (North of R-99) and the <br /> southern portion of the Project from R-106.5 to R-108 - to provide construction easements <br /> required for construction. <br /> This Scope of Work is to empirically evaluate the expected performance of alternative fill areas - <br /> particularly associated with modification of the northern Project boundary from R-97 to R-99, and <br /> the southern Project boundary from R-106.5 to R-108. The following describes the work under this <br /> Work Order: <br /> Task 1 -Alternative Assessment:The Consultant will: <br /> • update the Construction Drawings previously prepared for the Sector 7 Beach restoration <br /> Project with updated survey data provided by the County; <br /> • prepare Construction Drawings for an alternate Project which will remove the parcels where <br /> construction easements have not been signed as identified by the County; <br /> • identify the volume of sand required to construct the previously approved construction <br /> template and alternate construction template; <br /> • review monitoring surveys and reports surrounding and subsequent to the 2007 initial <br /> construction to identify the performance of the 2007 beach fill; <br /> • review the latest edition of the County's Beach Preservation Plan Update to be provided by <br /> the County; <br /> • perform volume change calculations within the Project limits based upon 2019 and 2024 <br /> survey data provided by the County; <br /> • based upon the post-construction monitoring data, beach preservation plan, and volume <br /> change calculations, characterize performance of two alternative potential future beach fill <br /> including: <br /> o as previously designed and permitted, and <br /> o as previously designed -excluding beach nourishment between R-97 to R-99, and R- <br /> 106.5 to R-108. <br /> • using empirical methods, quantify expected Project performance for years after <br /> construction as: <br /> o percent of beach fill remaining; <br /> o shore-normal width of beach berm from the Mean-High-Water-Line (MHWL) to the <br /> seaward toe of the dune or upland structure; and <br /> • summarize results of the above in a Technical Memo to the COUNTY; <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.