My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/29/2025
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2025
>
04/29/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2025 12:01:39 PM
Creation date
5/1/2025 1:25:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
04/29/2025
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
Subject
Final Meeting for the 2024 Tax Season
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Overview of the Subject Property: <br />The subject property is a single-family residence located at 7777 Grand Oak Circle <br />in Sebastian, FL. The property is a two story home built in 2009 and contains <br />3,473 SF of air conditioned area. The home includes nine rooms, four bedrooms <br />and three and '/z baths, a three car garage and a pool. The property is on a 0.58 acre <br />lot and had been partially remodeled on the interior as a result of flooding in the <br />upstairs bathroom in 2022. As of January 1St, 2024, the PA considered the home to <br />be in excellent condition as a result of the remodeling. <br />Summary of evidence presented by the property appraiser: <br />The PA established the just value for the property at $1,016,964 or $259 SF. <br />The PA presented 6 comparable sales of single family homes. The comparables <br />sold between $600,000 and $1,126,000 or between $231 SF to $339 SF. Sale 1 was <br />within the subject's subdivision and sold October 2023 for $600,000 or $248 SF. <br />The comparable sales were adjusted for the cost of sale at 15%, site size, condition, <br />bathroom count, square foot (SF) of living area, garage bays and miscellaneous for <br />not having a pool. <br />The PA testified that the first adjustment applied to the comparables was the <br />deduction for the cost of sale (COS) at 15%. (The COS adjustment was part of the <br />gross adjustments applied to the comparables. This was incorrect methodology, as <br />the cost of sale deduction should be made after establishing the preliminary value <br />based on the adjusted sale prices indicated by the comparables.) <br />Comparable 3, which was a waterfront property and sold for $1,126,000, was <br />adjusted downward by $100,000 for the waterfront location. Comparable 1 was <br />adjusted upward for its smaller lot size at $3.00 SF. The PA adjusted the <br />comparable sales, except for comparable sales 6, upward by $75 SF for condition. <br />The PA considered the subject to be in excellent condition due to the renovations <br />following the flooding in the house. The adjustment for the difference in bathroom <br />count was made at $10,000 per half bath. The adjustment for the difference in <br />living area was made at $175 SF. The adjustment for the difference in car storage <br />was made at $10,000 per bay. Only comparable 1, that was located within the <br />subject neighborhood, did not have a pool. An upward adjustment of $75,000 was <br />applied. The adjustments applied to the comparable sales appeared reasonable <br />based on the data presented. <br />2024-155 <br />Page 2 <br />-67- <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.