My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/12/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
11/12/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:06:01 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:01:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/12/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 99 PAfaE 759 <br />Given those conditions, the number of peak hour/peak season/peak <br />direction trips that would be generated by the most intense use of <br />the subject property under the existing land use designation was <br />calculated to be 194. This was determined by multiplying the total <br />number of units allowed (580) under the existing land use <br />designation by ITE's factor of 1.01 p.m. peak hour trips/unit, to <br />determine the total number of trips generated. Of these trips, 6516 <br />(381) will be inbound and 35% (205) will be outbound. Of the <br />inbound trips, 51% or 194 will be eastbound. <br />To determine the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />trips that would be generated by industrial development on Subject <br />Property 1, the total site acreage (101.8) was multiplied by ITE's <br />factor of 2.16 p.m. peak hour trips/acre to determine the total <br />number of trips generated (220). Of these trips, 50% (110) will be <br />inbound and 50% (110) will be outbound. Of the inbound trips, Sit <br />or 56 will be eastbound. Therefore, industrial devlopment Subject <br />Property 1 would generate 138 (194 - 56 = 138) fewer peak hour/peak <br />season/peak direction trips than the 194 that would be generated by <br />the most intense use of the subject property under the existing <br />land use designation. <br />Using a hand assignment, the peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />trips generated by the proposed use were then assigned to impacted <br />roads on the network. Impacted roads are defined in section <br />910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which <br />receive five percent (W or more of the project traffic or fifty <br />(50) or more of the project trips, whichever is less. <br />Capacities for all roadway segments in Indian River County are <br />calculated and updated annually, utilizing the latest and best <br />available peak season traffic characteristics and applying Appendix <br />G methodology as set forth in the Florida Department of <br />Transportation Level of Service Manual. Available capacity is the <br />total capacity less existing and committed (vested) traffic <br />volumes; this is updated daily based upon vesting associated with <br />project approvals. <br />The traffic capacity for the segment of SR 60 adjacent to this site <br />is 980 trips (peak hour/peak season/peak direction) at Level of <br />Service (LOS) "C", while the Total Segment Demand (existing traffic <br />volume + vested traffic volume) on this segment of SR 60 is 496 <br />trips (peak hour/peak season/peak direction). The additional 56 <br />peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips created by industrial <br />development on Subject Property 1 would increase the Total Segment <br />Demand peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips for this segment <br />of SR 60 to approximately 552. <br />Based on the above analysis, staff determined that SR 60 and all <br />other impacted roads can accommodate the additional trips without <br />decreasing their existing levels of service. <br />The table below identifies each of the impacted roadway segments <br />associated with industrial development on Subject Property 1. As <br />indicated in this table, there is sufficient capacity in all of the <br />segments to accommodate the projected traffic associated with the <br />request. <br />TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION <br />Impacted Road Segments <br />(peak hour/peak season/peak direction) <br />Roadway <br />Segment <br />Road <br />From <br />To <br />Segment <br />Capacity <br />LOS "D" <br />1220N <br />I-95 <br />C.R. 512 <br />S.R. 60 <br />2700 <br />1220S <br />I-95 <br />C.R. 512 <br />S.R. 60 <br />2700 <br />1230N <br />I-95 <br />S.R. 60 <br />Oslo Road <br />2640 <br />12305 <br />I-95 <br />S.R. 60 <br />Oslo Road <br />2640 <br />1335N <br />U.S. <br />1 <br />17th Street <br />S.R. 60 <br />2270 <br />1335S <br />U.S. <br />1 <br />17th Street <br />S.R. 60 <br />2270 <br />1340N <br />U.S. <br />1 <br />S.R. 60 <br />Royal Palm <br />2300 <br />1340S <br />U.S. <br />1 <br />S.R. 60 <br />Royal Palm <br />2300 <br />1910E <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />100 Ave. <br />I-95 <br />980 <br />1910W <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />100 Ave. <br />I-95 <br />980 <br />1915E <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />I-95 <br />82 Ave. <br />1890 <br />1915W <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />I-95 <br />82 Ave. <br />1890 <br />1920E <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />82 Ave. <br />66th Ave. <br />3110 <br />1920W <br />S.R. <br />60 <br />82 Ave. <br />66th Ave. <br />3110 <br />NOVEMBER 12, 1996 94 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.