11/12/1996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BOOK 99 f -,u 763 -Subject Property 2 Because development in the area of Subject Property 2 is dominated by the landfill, agriculture, and various industrial uses, impacts on surrounding property are not a major concern for this property. The impacts of development of Subject Property 2 are anticipated to be similar under either the existing C/I or the requested PUB land use designations. The most likely use of the site, under the requested PUB land use designation, is for a recycling park. Some activities associated with commercial/ industrial uses are also associated with public facilities uses, particularly landfill uses. Examples of such uses include heavy equipment operation, repair, and storage. In fact, in terms of impacts on surrounding areas, - Recreation Recreation concurrency requirements apply only to residential development. Therefore, this comprehensive plan amendment request would not be required to satisfy recreation concurrency requirements. Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid waste, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to accommodate an industrial park on Subject Property 1. Compatibility with the Surrounding Area - Subject Property 1 The proposed amendment will not increase potential incompatibilities associated with development of Subject Property 1. Since this property abuts commercial/ industrial designated land to the southeast, the proposed redesignation would result in a continuation of an existing land use designation pattern. The primary impacts of industrial development on Subject Property 1 would be on the Vero Tropical Garden subdivision along the east side of 98th Avenue. Despite being platted in 1960, this subdivision remains largely undeveloped. There are also several factors that indicate that industrial development on Subject Property 1 would not be incompatible with residential development in the Vero Tropical Garden subdivision. In contrast to the properties to the north and west of Subject Property 1, the Vero Tropical Garden properties are relatively small in size and, therefore, do not have the option of providing additional buffering. They do, however, have the advantage of an additional 100 feet of separation due to canal and road right-of- way. LDR provisions that would work to mitigate potential impacts on these properties from industrial development on Subject Property 1 include a Type "A" vegetative buffer with a six foot opaque feature, and a required 25 foot front yard. To minimize the mixing of residential and commercial traffic, access to industrial development on Subject Property 1 would be required to be from SR 60. Finally, LDR chapter 926 requires perimeter landscaping, as well as landscaping of parking lots, and open space. For these reasons, staff feels that the proposed amendment will not increase potential incompatibilities associated with development of Subject Property 1. -Subject Property 2 Because development in the area of Subject Property.2 is dominated by the landfill, agriculture, and various industrial uses, impacts on surrounding property are not a major concern for this property. The impacts of development of Subject Property 2 are anticipated to be similar under either the existing C/I or the requested PUB land use designations. The most likely use of the site, under the requested PUB land use designation, is for a recycling park. Some activities associated with commercial/industrial uses are also associated with public facilities uses, particularly landfill uses. Examples of such uses include heavy equipment operation, repair, and storage. In fact, in terms of impacts on surrounding areas, NOVEMBER 12, 1996 98