Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK 99 PAu.733 <br />Transportation System <br />SR 60 provides access to the site. The portion of SR 60 between <br />58th Avenue and 66th Avenue has approximately 200 feet of public <br />road right-of-way and is classified as a principal arterial on the <br />future roadway thoroughfare plan map. West of 58th Avenue, SR 60 <br />is currently under construction to expand from four to six lanes: <br />No other expansions of this portion of SR 60 are programmed at this <br />time. <br />ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application will be presented. The analysis will address: <br />• concurrency of public facilities; <br />• compatibility with the surrounding area; <br />• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and <br />• potential impact on environmental quality. <br />Concurrencv of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations also <br />require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum <br />acceptable standards for these services and facilities are <br />maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests, <br />conditional concurrency review is required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests are not <br />projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to be <br />based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon <br />the requested zoning district or land use designation. For <br />commercial Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, the most intense <br />use (according to the county's Land Development Regulations) is <br />retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per <br />acre of land proposed for redesignation. The site information used <br />for the concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be <br />Redesignated: <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: <br />3. Proposed Land Use Designation: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Current <br />Land Use Designation: <br />t4.6 acres <br />M-1, Medium -Density <br />Residential -1 (up to 8 <br />units/acre) <br />C/I, Commercial - <br />Industrial Node <br />36 Dwelling Units <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property under Proposed Land Use <br />Designation: 46,000 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial <br />(Shopping Center in the 5th Edition ITE Manual). <br />- Transportation <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the <br />development of the property indicates that the existing level of <br />service "D" or better on SR 60 and other impacted roads would not <br />be lowered. The site information used for determining traffic <br />impacts is as follows: <br />NOVEMBER 12, 1996 <br />68 <br />r <br />