My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/12/1996
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1996
>
11/12/1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:06:01 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:01:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/12/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
market area. eor rnar reason, shifting land between these nodes <br />without updating the projections, need assessments, and standards <br />used to prepare the original plan is acceptable. <br />- Land Use Efficiency <br />The proposed amendment involves reconfiguring two commercial/ <br />industrial nodes. The node containing Subject Property 1 has <br />access to both SR 60 and I-95, while the node containing Subject <br />Property 2 focuses principally on Oslo Road and has no access to I- <br />95. <br />Several factors indicate that the demand for commercial/ industrial <br />designated land is greater at the SR 60/I-95 Node than at the Oslo <br />Road Node. The most important of these factors involves the <br />county's efforts to attract industry and increase employment. <br />Businesses considering locating or relocating in Indian River <br />County have repeatedly indicated a preference for the SR 60/I-95 <br />Node. These businesses cite the central location, the proximity to <br />other businesses and population, and the easy access to major <br />roads. In contrast, the Oslo Road Node is relatively isolated from <br />business and population centers, and has less access to major <br />roads. <br />Other factors also suggest that the proposed node reconfiguration <br />is more logical and efficient than the existing configuration. <br />These factors include: <br />• population growth along the SR 60 Corridor and in the northern <br />portion of the county; <br />• recent developments in the SR 60/I-95 Node (including a retail <br />center that is anticipated to soon surpass DRI thresholds); <br />• future landfill expansion; and <br />• the land owners' proposed use of the subject properties. <br />For these reasons, the proposed node reconfiguration represents a <br />logical and rational land use plan change that will facilitate <br />efficient land use within the county. <br />Urban Service Area Expansion <br />Besides node reconfiguration, the proposed amendment includes <br />extending the USA boundary approximately one-eighth of a mile west, <br />on the north side of SR 60. In terms of distance and area (29.5 <br />acres), this is a minor expansion that will not encourage urban <br />sprawl. <br />The USA expansion, however, is important to the county's efforts to <br />attract industry and increase employment. The proposed amendment <br />would result in the creation of the first tract in the county that <br />meets the minimum size, location and ownership requirements <br />necessary to develop an adequately sized, viable industrial park. <br />That site would consist of Subject Property 1 and the adjacent, <br />industrially designated 36.5 acre tract at the northwest corner of <br />SR 60 and 98th Avenue. For the industrial park to be developed, <br />however, centralized potable water and wastewater service must be <br />available to the entire 138.3 acre site. <br />For these reasons, the proposed USA expansion will implement the <br />county's economic development goals without encouraging urban <br />sprawl. <br />Ccncurrency of Public Facilities . <br />Except for the west 29.5 acres of Subject Property 1, both sites <br />comprising this request are located within the County Urban Service <br />Area, an area deemed suited for urban scale development. The <br />comprehensive plan establishes standards for: Transportation, <br />Potable Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage, and Recreation <br />(Future Land Use Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these <br />services is necessary to ensure the continued quality of life <br />enjoyed by the community. To ensure that the minimum acceptable <br />standards for these services and facilities are maintained, the <br />comprehensive plan requires that new development be reviewed. For <br />land use designation amendment requests, this review is undertaken <br />as part of the conditional concurrency determination application <br />process. <br />NOVEMBER 12, 1996 91 boa 99 pm 756 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.