05/20/2025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

F. On January 28, 2025, Respondent's counsel relayed that the Respondents agreed with the attached easement but wanted some minor changes to the waiver language. G. Although the easement had been agreed to and the parties had agreed to the Respondent's fees and costs, the Respondents have not signed the stipulation to date. H. Respondent Gambin admitted at the hearing that, while he could not originally agree to the terms of the easement, they have now agreed (200') and there are no remaining disputes. It appears that there may have been some disagreement to the waiver and release language and Respondent Jackson raises issues related to water and air that are totally irrelevant to an eminent domain proceeding. I. Uncertainty as to nonessential terms or small items will not preclude enforcement of a settlement agreement. However, all of the essential and material terms in this matter were fully negotiated and agreed to by the parties and were incorporated into the proposed Final Judgment. Portner v. Koppel, 382 So. 3d 742 (Fla. 41 DCA 2024); Spiegel v. H. Allen Holmes, Inc., 834 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 4th SCA 2002) and Vision Palm Springs, LLLP v. Michael Anthony Co., 272 So. 3d 441 (Fla. 31t DCA 2019). IT IS THUS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petitioner's Motion is GRANTED and the Court shall enter a Final Judgment simultaneously herewith. The Court retains jurisdiction for all legal and proper purposes DONE AND ORDERED in Indian River County, Florida can this 17th day of April, 2025. eSignea'6y judge cynihia L. o:X 04/17/2025 4:15 pm CYNTHIA L COX, Circuit Judge Copies via eportal service to: William P. Doney, Esq. Ian Eielson kin sq. doney(d)caldwellpacetti.com iosking(o)neillpriffin.com Attorney for Indian River County Attorney for Respondents Susan Prado, Esq sprado(aD_indianriver.gov Attorney for Indian River County 2 59