Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> physical verification of the assets in place has been completed,yes perhaps even inter-related with <br /> a"trend and bend"work effort. No,a sloppy trend and bend job will not provide adequate proof <br /> of loss. Yes,the information must be kept up to date. The asset listings and value information <br /> must be kept up to date either within the fixed asset accounting system or as a separate aside record, <br /> incorporating inflation.!deflation adjustments,changes in depreciation if appropriate for the policy <br /> /contract form,and of course additions or deletions. <br /> Critical property and casualty insurance thoughts: <br /> • One may rather deal with the IRS than fight an insurance battle. <br /> • Understand the insurance policy ("contract")coinsurance clause where assured shares in <br /> the settlement to the extent(say 80%usual)of the insurance that should have been carried. <br /> • The fixed asset accounting record io not adequate proof of loss. I repeat, the fixed asset <br /> accounting record is not adequate proof°floss. <br /> • Understand the difference between a Replacement Cost policy and an Actual Cash Value <br /> policy <br /> • Replacement Cost policies are"repair or replace"often up to Actual Cash Value(aa litigious <br /> issue,also considering the issues of Market Value,depreciation or betterment). <br /> • Further, if Replacement Cost, usually the insurance policy (contract) states that Actual <br /> Cash Value will be paid until or if the covered assets arc replaced (language varies per <br /> differing forms),then if replaced the full Replacement Cost is paid. <br /> • Actual Cash Value generally considers the current cost new for the same functional utility, <br /> less physical depreciation / deterioration. But in some instances ACV is considered to <br /> mean the cost of replacing the asset at Market Value(another litigious issue). <br /> • Being unprepared to prove one's loss may prove to be extremely costly,particularly if one <br /> had not gone through the exercise and cost of perpetually being prepared in advance. <br /> • The insurance company will not pay for betterments,meaning if you have an old Model.A <br /> asset and now a Model B is only available you will not receive the settlement for a Model <br /> B loss. Check insurance contracts in this regard concerning betterments. <br /> • The insurance company may well not pay fbr engineering or intangible assets relating to <br /> specific tangible assets. Check the policy and/or discuss this matter with the broker. <br /> • Understand what the insurance policy says. One can under-insure as well as over-insure. <br /> A personal note. Are you prepared for a loss at your home? Do you have the proof of value and <br /> listing of the assets,or at least photos or a movie/video of the residence and the contents? Is this <br /> information somewhere else other than in your residence? All are encouraged to get prepared for <br /> an unfortunate insured event. But imagine in a loss situation how much less of a fair settlement <br /> you would receive if such data is not available. Then project this thought into your business <br /> situation. Not good? You are encouraged to cure this situation in all regards. <br /> Alex Ruden, ASA (M&TS & ARM). CG/GA, Business Valuer, is the fourth generation of his <br /> family in the appraisal/valuation business. His great grandfather was a Public Adjuster being a <br /> 4.12Q <br />