Laserfiche WebLink
1. The Petitioner did not comport with the (1) subsection of Florida Statute 196.031 and the"A person who, <br /> on January 1 has the legal title or beneficial title in equity to real property in this state and who in good faith <br /> makes the property his or her permanent residence" clause of the statute because of the preponderance of the <br /> evidence showing that the Petitioner did not comport with subsections (4), and (6) of Florida Statute 196.015. <br /> ' A preponderance of the evidence shows that the Petitioner testified that he hunting and fishing license is free <br /> in the state of Texas if the person holding the hunting and fishing license also has a Texas driver's license, <br /> and that the Property Appraiser witness Veronica Jarman testified that the Texas driver's license is for a Texas <br /> resident benefit which is the hunting and fishing license that the Petitioner has which does not comport with <br /> subsection (4) and the "previous permanent residency by the applicant in a state other than Florida or in <br /> another country and the date non-Florida residency was terminated" language of Florida Statute 196.015 and <br /> does not comport with the language of subsection (6) of Florida Statute 196.015 and the "valid Florida driver <br /> license issued under s. 322.18 or a valid Florida identification card issued under s. 322.051 and evidence of <br /> relinquishment of driver licenses from any other states" clause of the statute because the Petitioner has not <br /> demonstrated the"evidence of relinquishment of driver licenses from any other states" language of Florida <br /> Statute 196.015 because of the Texas hunting license and Texas driver's license. As a result, a <br /> preponderance of the evidence shows that the Petitioner did not comport with the "who in good faith makes <br /> the property his or her permanent residence" clause of Florida Statute 196,031 because of the aforementioned <br /> reasoning and conclusion. <br /> For the aforementioned reasons, it is recommended that PETITITON: 2024-003 is recommended to be <br /> DENIED. <br /> rrn <br /> °��n�� --' -- ---------- - --- <br /> Rdof5pecial.Magistrate The findhig and conclusions above are recommendations. <br /> ---- ' — JOSEPH HAYNES DAVI <br /> -- <br /> ESQUIRE 2/7/2025 <br /> � <br /> � no��' �'n~'| Printvame Date -- <br /> _�� - <br /> Signature, AB -rk or special representative Print name bate <br /> If this is a - ommended decision,the board will consider the recommended decision on at 0 AM 0 PM. <br /> Address <br /> If the line above is blank.please oeU orv��our website at <br /> . | <br /> [| Final |���igi��� ���������v& E�m�r� <br /> �~ Adjustment <br /> Signature,chair,value adjustment board --' -- Print name -- ' Date of decision <br /> Signature,VA8clerk urnepLesentadve Print name Date mailed to parties <br /> -30 - <br />