07/29/2025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Findings of Fact for Petition 2024- The Petitioner's Agent, with :., attended the hearing via telephone.Valentina .and Michelle were present at the hearing representing the Property Appraisers office. As per testimony,the evidence exchange complied with statutory time frame requirements.No objections by either party were made related to data submittal. The subject is located in a highrise condo building in The Summit Condo.The subject is located in the north building. The subject has 2 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms.The subject is an interior unit on the 18th floor and has an unobstructed northerly view of the intracoastal/city/ocean view.The subject has 1,570 adjusted building square footage and was built in 1982. The subject's project has 2 buildings.There is a north building and a south building. The subject is located in the north building. The Property Appraiser provided the Broward county property appraiser's certification of evidence, Subject's property record card,Aerial views of subject, Subject's location map,Exterior photos of subject,North tower and south tower unit building layouts,Floorplans for"C" units and"D" units, Subject and comparable unit locator, Summary of 4 comparable sales, Summary of 2 comparable sales,Department of Revenue's Broward county time trend,DR-493, Florida Statutes and misc. information. The Property Appraiser provided as rebuttal evidence a Summary of 5 comparable sales with the Property Appraiser's sales and the Petitioner's unit 4105 sale added. The Property Appraiser utilized 4 comparable sales in the subject's project.The Property Appraiser's comparables are the same model as the subject. Comparable#1 is located in the same building as the subject,but is on a much lower floor than the subject and is not the bestsale to indicate the subject's value. Comparable#2 is located in the subject's building on the 10th floor and has a north view like the subject and is a good indicator of value. Comparable#3 is located in the south building and is on a much lower floor than the subject and is not the best sale to indicate the subject's value. Comparable#4 is located in the south building on the 19th floor,has a similar view as the subject and is a good indicator of value. Out of the 4 comparables sales that the Property Appraiser's provided,comparables#2 and #4 should be utilized to determine the subject's value as they are the most similar to the subject. The Property Appraiser stated the floor height adjustment also included a view adjustment. The Petitioner provided as evidence the Ownwell cover page,Property summary, Property photos,Evaluation summary, 7 Sales comparables,7 Adjusted sales comparables and Comparable map. The Petitioner provided 7 comparable sales in the subject's project.The Petitioner's comparables#1,#2,#3,#4 and#6 are the same model as the subject. Comparables#1 and#3 have obstructed views and are not the best sales to indicate the subject's value. Comparable#2 is located on the 20th floor in the subject's building,has a similar northern view as the subject and is a good indicator of value, Comparable#4 is located on a much lower floor than the subject and is not the best sale to indicate the subject's value. Comparable#5 is a corner unit with a direct intracoastal/city/ocean view and is larger in adjusted building square feet than the subject and is not the best sale to indicate the subject's value. Comparable#6 is shared with the Property Appraiser. Comparable#6 is located on the 19th floor in the south building and has a similar view as the subject and is a good indicator of value. Comparable#7 is a corner unit with a direct intracoastal/city/ocean view and is larger in adjusted building square feet than the subject and is not the best sale to indicate the subject's value. Out of the 7 comparables sales that the Petitioner provided,comparables#2 and#6 should ae utilized to determine the subject's value as they are the most similar to the subject. [he Property Appraiser's comparable sales#2 and#4 and the Petitioner's comparables#2 and#6 are the best overall ;ales to determine the subject's value as they are the same model as the subject,most similar in floor height and have a similar view as the subject. [he Property Appraiser did not adjust the comparable sales in the market grid for cost of sale.The Property Appraiser lid apply the cost of sale in their evidence and testimony at the hearing.The Property Appraiser took into :onsiderration the 10%for cost of sale in the summary of comparable sales.The subject's cost of sale of 10%for the ubject's use code was found on the DR-493 form provided as evidence by the Property Appraiser. -57- 2024 Page 2 of 4