My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/29/2025
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2025
>
07/29/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2025 3:11:16 PM
Creation date
7/25/2025 12:55:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Value Adjustment Board
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
07/29/2025
Meeting Body
Value Adjustment Board
Subject
Value Adjustment Board Organizational Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Appraiser Special Magistrate(SM)conducted a hearing that occurred on Nov 14,2024 for the <br /> correctness of the 2024 Just/Market Value of 211 Beachside Dr(31-39-23-00011-0000-00021.0)in Vero <br /> Beach.At the hearing were the Special Magistrate,clerk(Terri),representatives from Indian River <br /> County Property Appraisers Office(PAO) and James Calkins the petitioner(PET)with Janice Cosden& <br /> Alexandra Mishler from Cosden-Mishler Appraisers. Both parties presented evidence in support of their <br /> opinions for the subject value <br /> The PAO evidence consisted of a cover page, information/evidence request letter,evidence exchange <br /> 12D-9.020 document,methodology and consideration page, 193.011 Factors to consider document, <br /> emails from PET,copies of the PET appraisal,subject property card,subject MLS from the 2023 sale, <br /> land value analysis,aerial photos of subject and comparables,comparable grid,map of <br /> subject/comparables, property cards/aerial photos of the comparables and case law documents.A 15% <br /> cos (cost of sale) adjustment was considered. <br /> The PET evidence consisted of an appraisal on a GP Residential form,assessment comparison pages, <br /> property cards for subject/comparables and time trend submitted as rebuttal/additional data. <br /> All documents were admissible,and all evidence was admitted into evidence without objection. <br /> Upon examination of the evidence submitted,the PAO provided a grid with four sales(two shared with <br /> the PET).The PAO applied adjustments in the grid for size,bathrooms,effective age,WFF(water front <br /> footage),location and cos. No adjustments were applied for the subject having a much larger garage size <br /> than the comparables. The four sales provide an average adjusted value of$11,607,050. <br /> The PAO provided a vacant land analysis that showed the increasing land values from 2021 through <br /> 2023.The first page of the land analysis showed a price per sf and WFF breakdown. The second page of <br /> the land sales showed increase in sale prices for parcels that had a sale and then a subsequent sale with <br /> the minimum increase of 4%monthly from 04/2021 to 05/2022.The other sales had 6%monthly from <br /> 06/2021 to 01/2023 and the third was a 40%increase in 3 months(flip sale).This data does provide <br /> sufficient support for the subject land value portion at$3,093,179($25,354 WFF/between$81-82 per <br /> sf). <br /> The PAO commented on the vacant land sale in Apr 2021 that was next to the subject. The aerial <br /> imagery shows the site was vacant/raw land on the effective date(photo flight date was Jan 2,2024 per <br /> PAO).This parcel has less buildable land,less front footage with a wider WFF view.The land sale value <br /> plus an increase on the low end still supports the land assessment portion. <br /> - 75 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.