07/29/2025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

8150 Highway A1A was also similarly adjusted by both parties except the location adjustment by the PET. Without the location adjustment the adjusted values from both parties are less than$200,000 apart(less than 2%difference). PAO sale 2 is the high sale from both parties.The PAO applied a large effective age adjustment for being newer construction (no data provided to confirm/dispute the adjustment)and appeared reasonable and similar to the other comparable adjustments. 1916 Ocean Dr had an inferior age/effective age adjustment that was large. No MLS data was presented to validate/dispute the adjustment. The PAO provided the adjustment amounts on the bottom of their grid which appear reasonable for large luxury ocean front properties. The PET had seven comparables.Comparable 5 was excluded per the PAO indicating it was an auction sale and not a typical arms-length transaction.Comp 5 had a 100%overall increase from sale price to the adjusted value further reducing the credibility of this sale. Comparables 6&7 were from 2019. The PET did apply an increasing trend adjustment which the SM did not deem fully supported.The PET provided a one-line grid to support the adjustments; however,the data was not just for similar properties. A brief synopsis of the data showed majority of the sales were inferior properties with sale prices below$5million.There were 6 of 18 above$5M for 2019,4 of 30 in 2020, 11 of 38 in 2021,5 of 11 in 2022 and 4 of 13 in 2023.A further analysis shows number of sales above$9M to be 1 for 2019&2020,4 in 2021,2 in 2022 and 3 in 2023. Looking at the data the size of the dwellings is important with the number of properties above 8,000 sf were 4 in 2019,5 in 2020,6 in 2021, 1 in 2022 and 3 in 2023. The three large sales in 2023 were the subject sale at$13M and two others at$22M&$22.5M. These sales over 8,000 sf in size are mostly much higher in value than the smaller dwellings reducing the credibility of the trend. Insufficient data was available on these sales to determine size,condition,location etc prior to extracting a trend adjustment. PET sale 2 is not deemed comparable with a GLA almost half the subject size with a 0.3 acre parcel which is not comparable to acre+/-properties. The PET adjusted value is 276%higher than the actual sale price. A$2.5M view adjustment lends support for not being comparable as the ocean view is not direct. PET sale 3 is insufficiently adjusted being a riverfront property and not oceanfront.This sale would require different adjustments for WFF as the oceanfront properties have view while the riverfront properties dock sizes/depth of water become most important for boat/yacht owners. The PET included the guesthouse living areas of the comparables in the overall gla which may or may not be fully supported.The SM did not have additional supporting/market area data to verify the -77-