My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/09/2025 (3)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2025
>
07/09/2025 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2025 10:06:20 AM
Creation date
10/20/2025 10:05:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Workshop Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/09/2025
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Subject
Budget Workshop
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final July 9, 2025 <br />Sheriffs request. <br />To manage costs, Administrator Titkanich proposed a multiplier for expenses <br />associated with sworn officers, resulting in about $6.1 million needed to address <br />salary concerns. Strategies to mitigate costs included deferring capital expenses and <br />trimming specific budget items, such as funding for the animal shelter. However, this <br />potentially would result in safety concerns for the community. Additionally, Road <br />Maintenance, which would not be able to address the backlog being experienced. He <br />also discussed the Mental Health Court's funding needs, suggesting collaboration with <br />human services while emphasizing the importance of maintaining mental health services <br />to alleviate pressure on the criminal justice system. <br />Administrator Titkanich addressed the topic of the 28 County positions under <br />discussion, noting that five of these positions were funded by the General Fund, while <br />the others were supported by various funds and not through ad valorem taxes. He <br />emphasized that it would not be appropriate for utility customers to fund a general <br />fund employee, nor was it fair to use the general fund to supplement the sheriffs <br />funding. He pointed out that residents in unincorporated areas and MSTUs were <br />already paying for services provided outside their regions, creating a need for a <br />balancing act in funding decisions. <br />Administrator Titkanich expressed optimism about rounding up the funding to $6.1 <br />million but maintained a cautious approach, considering the Sheriffs substantial <br />operational demands. The proposed increases warranted careful evaluation, as some <br />were significant enough that their implications were clear at a glance, without requiring <br />a detailed examination. <br />Administrator Titkanich highlighted growing concerns over the past three years <br />regarding whether these funding increases would translate into employee raises. Two <br />years prior, he had addressed these concerns by agreeing to $5.7 million increase, <br />with the Sheriffs assurance that there would be no reversal of that commitment. <br />Feedback from the community at that time indicated clear support for the Board's <br />decision, entrusting the Sheriff to manage the allocated funds as promised. He noted <br />that the exceptional provision allowing fund transfers within the Sheriffs Office did not <br />extend to other Constitutional offices. <br />When discussing reserves, Administrator Titkanich clarified that the belief in having <br />$600 million was mistaken. The combined total from the MSTU and the General <br />Fund was approximately $102.5 million, with a significant portion restricted, <br />non -spendable, or committed, leaving only a small amount unassigned. He compared <br />the situation to continually withdrawing from a savings account, warning that <br />Indian River County, Florida Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.