Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners Special Call Meeting Minutes - Final August 12, 2025 <br />there was inadequate time to review such a large report, and the process did not <br />make use of the advisory boards, especially the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />(PZC). She questioned whether there was time for another meeting and discussion <br />before submitting the EAR. Mr. Murphy explained that the timeline to evaluate the <br />Plan elements was up to the County, and any element could be evaluated at any time; <br />transmittal of the EAR, however, had to be done following the public hearings. <br />County Attorney Jennifer Shuler confirmed there was a 10 -day deadline following <br />completion of the public hearing(s) to transmit the report. She recommended <br />continuing this public hearing to a time -certain one if the Board wanted to take more <br />time. <br />Vice Chairman Loar noted this was a fluid document, and that all the changes had <br />previously been brought before the Board. Commissioner Earman was not ready to <br />make a final decision today and favored an additional meeting. Chairman Flescher <br />echoed Vice Chairman Loar's comments that the content was not new, but noted <br />there was discomfort among the Board with making a decision today, and he was <br />open to continuing the hearing. Commissioner Adams requested starting the policy <br />discussion during this meeting, even if a second meeting was held. <br />County Administrator John Titkanich added that any additional meetings needed to be <br />completed in time to send the report before October 1, 2025. He also noted the <br />proposed policies were published July 7, 2025 for public review, with the matrix of <br />changes coming before the Board on November 12, 2024. Additional discussion was <br />had regarding the process that followed the transmittal of the EAR, allowing time for <br />comments and concerns, and giving the Planning and Zoning Committee additional <br />review time. There was also reiteration that the EAR report was meant to capture <br />statutory changes, while the County could do a deep dive into the 13 Comprehensive <br />Plan Elements at any time. <br />Chairman Flescher opened the floor for public comments. The following people <br />addressed the Board: <br />David Cox, Beach and Shore Advisory Committee, was in favor of additional review <br />time, and mentioned a new nonprofit - the Gopher Tortoise Alliance. <br />Gerry -Ana Jones, Gopher Tortoise Alliance, provided the Board with proposed <br />language changes to further protect the tortoises. <br />Jeff Andros requested information regarding the amount of money the County has <br />spent on consultants to assist staff. <br />Rusty Banack questioned the coordination and cooperation efforts between the <br />County and Municipalities regarding land regulations, especially on annexed land. He <br />Indian River County, Florida Page 2 <br />