Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final September 9, 2025 <br />would maintain building height limitations in the LDRs and respective zoning <br />district regulations to preserve the low-density character of neighborhoods and <br />protect the low -intensity commercial nodes. <br />Commissioner Moss raised concerns about proposed changes that involved <br />moving certain standards from the Plan to LDRs. She strongly objected, <br />particularly regarding the Future Land Use Element, as the LDRs could be <br />changed more easily without community input, unlike the Plan, which required <br />formal approval from Tallahassee. This shift threatened long-standing community <br />standards, such as height restrictions. Commissioner Moss expressed gratitude for <br />the thorough discussions during a subsequent PZC meeting and emphasized the <br />importance of retaining Elements within the Plan to protect the community's <br />character and lifestyle. <br />Commissioner Adams sought clarification as there appeared to be some <br />misinformation about how the Plan related to LDRs and, in turn, how those <br />related to zoning. Acting Planning and Development Services Director Ryan <br />Sweeney clarified that Policy 1.38 specifically applied to "New Towns." This <br />policy was the only reference in the Plan's Future Land Use Element that <br />mentioned building heights. He explained that height restrictions were not detailed <br />for other land uses, such as L 1 and Cl. According to the policy, residential <br />buildings could be up to 35 feet tall, while non-residential or mixed-use buildings <br />could reach up to 50 feet. This allowed heights greater than 35 feet in "New <br />Towns," especially west of Interstate 95, which were outside the Urban Service <br />Boundary (USB). Mr. Sweeney noted that there were no other references to <br />building heights in the Future Land Use Element. <br />Commissioner Adams addressed the broader conceptual issue of the Plan and its <br />relationship to the LDRs. She asked if everything included in the LDRs was also <br />part of the Plan. Then, for the sake of efficiency, could the Board eliminate one or <br />the other. In response, Mr. Sweeney suggested an alternative perspective. He <br />explained that there was a policy stating that the building's height shall not exceed <br />35 feet Countywide. However, in a low-density residential area, the LDR can set <br />a lower limit, capping it at 25 feet. The Plan establishes an upper limit, while the <br />LDRs can be more restrictive. For instance, the L1 LDR allows up to three units <br />per acre, the RS2 zoning permits two units per acre, and the RS3 zoning allows <br />three units per acre. The LDRs can have more stringent regulations. LDRs <br />establish definitive parameters like building coverage, setbacks, and lot sizes, <br />which would not be appropriate to include at the Plan level. <br />Administrator Titkanich followed up by outlining that the Plan was the underlying <br />Indian River County, Florida Page 11 <br />