09/09/2025 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final September 9, 2025 Commissioner Earman referenced his earlier communications with the Group's Attorney concerning concerns raised by property owners about the proposed amendments to the 2025 plan, which aimed to establish a "New Town" development framework. The Group was opposed to the amendments, believing they significantly deviated from the existing Land Use Policies. Commissioner Earman confirmed that there have been no changes or discussions regarding zoning for the property, which remained designated for agricultural use. He also noted that no changes were expected until they were deemed appropriate. Administrator Titkanich added that Senate Bill 180 prevents the County from implementing more restrictive Comprehensive Plan amendments until 2027, which protects the group's existing rights. Mr. Yerramsetty stressed the need for the County to embrace a pro -development approach, as many local voices support this vision. Commissioner Earman also referenced the opposition from the St. John's Improvement District to the "New Town" policy, noting that this policy had been in place since 2008 and did not impact the rights of existing landowners, while still allowing for development within planned development frameworks. Kelly Jackson emphasized the importance of local voices in decision-making processes, believing that genuine community engagement was crucial for fostering a healthier and more sustainable environment. Lisa Snycerski recognized the need for economic development, urging a more thoughtful approach that considers local wildlife and habitats. She concluded by expressing her discontent with the direction her community was headed in. Gerry -Ana Jones from the Gopher Tortoise Alliance appreciated the review of the Plan, emphasizing the need to address both the Plan and outdated LDRs for streamlined public input. She raised concerns about Exemption 927.06 in the LDR and requested a discussion about adjustments after the plan was completed. Administrator Titkanich noted the Plan typically takes about 75 days for feedback and 180 days for final responses, after which the Board would focus on implementation and updating the LDRs to meet new requirements. Vice Mayor Fred Jones of the City of Sebastian expressed support for proposed amendments to the Sanitary Sewer Sub -element, which focused on the unincorporated areas of the County rather than municipalities. The City also backed language that affirmed the County's commitment to a 1995 Interlocal Agreement ensuring sanitary sewer services to Sebastian. The City appreciated the efforts of County staff in crafting this language, which addressed concerns that previous proposals might have had an adverse impact on the City of Sebastian. Indian River County, Florida Page 23