Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final September 9, 2025 <br />issues. He noted that the Board had to adhere to current contract terms. Chairman <br />Flescher opposed the proposal, emphasizing the need to prevent similar situations in <br />the future. <br />Attorney Shuler defended her approach, suggesting a more straightforward approval <br />process or a comprehensive evaluation. She highlighted her efforts to improve <br />employee conditions and address salary disparities. <br />The discussion also involved interpretations of contracts regarding progressive pay, <br />with differing views on whether it was guaranteed for certain officials. Chairman <br />Flescher criticized the motivation behind adding the issue to the agenda, noting that it <br />had only arisen after the auditor's actions. <br />Ultimately, the Board aimed to establish clearer compensation practices for the future. <br />The discussion primarily focused on the fairness and transparency of contracts for <br />County employees, especially concerning their benefits and evaluations. <br />Chairman Flescher opened the floor for public comment. <br />Tom Sullivan expressed support for the County Administrator and Attorney, <br />highlighting positive perceptions of their performance and agreeing with Commissioner <br />Earman that there were no major issues. <br />Jeff Andros raised concerns over transparency, particularly regarding communications <br />with the County Attorney and the modification of the meeting agenda related to her <br />evaluation. He indicated intentions to file a public records lawsuit due to perceived <br />lack of proper notice and unfulfilled records requests, suggesting possible undisclosed <br />arrangements tied to contract approvals. <br />Attorney Shuler defended her office's handling of records requests, noting the <br />completion of some requests and the ongoing processing of others. She emphasized <br />her hope to resolve disputes amicably and cited fees associated with extensive <br />records requests as a concern. <br />Mr. Andros countered by reiterating his concerns for his credibility and the necessity <br />of revealing $34 million in consulting expenses, calling for broader media involvement <br />in seeking the same records. <br />Chairman Flescher shared an email regarding the retroactive adjustments for <br />Administrator Titkanich, who had not received a performance evaluation, and noted <br />the importance of communication in light of public records requests. Administrator <br />Indian River County, Florida Page 37 <br />