My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/2025
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2020's
>
2025
>
10/23/2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2026 12:08:14 PM
Creation date
1/16/2026 11:21:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Date
10/23/2025
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
changes to the current PD ordinance to specify what types of public benefits are acceptable or preferred. <br />2. Define Waivers (Deviations) from the Current Zoning Requirements: <br />The County's current PD ordinance contains a list of development parameters that may be waived via the PD <br />process in Section 915.15 (see Attachment 1). Those development parameters generally include items such as <br />minimum lot size, minimum lot width, minimum yard setbacks for primary structures, minimum yard setbacks <br />for accessory structures (such as pools, patios, and decks), maximum lot coverage, minimum separation <br />distance between buildings, minimum ROW widths, minimum open space per lot, and. minimum <br />preservation/conservation area per lot. However, the current ordinance does not specify or limit the degree at <br />which each parameter may be waived. For example, if a project site's underlying zoning is RS -3, which <br />normally requires a minimum 80 -foot lot width, there is no policy direction or guidance that limits or prohibits <br />an applicant from requesting a significantly reduced lot width (such as 40 feet). <br />Recommendation: Staff recommends that the BCC and the PZC consider providing policy direction or actual <br />changes to the current PD ordinance to specify the degree at which each development parameter may be <br />waived. Staff recommends the following two options to consider: <br />Option 1: Provide a percentage limitation for each waiver. For example, the lot width may only be reduced by <br />no more than 25%. Therefore, an 80 -foot -wide lot in the RS -3 district may only be reduced to 60 feet, and a 70 - <br />foot -wide lot may in the RS -6 district may only be reduced to 52.5 feet. <br />Option 2: Provide a specific/defined limitation for each waiver. For example, the lot width may only be reduced <br />by no more than 15 feet. Therefore, an 80 -foot -wide lot in the RS -3 district may only be reduced to 65 feet, and <br />a 70 -foot -wide lot may in the RS -6 district may only be reduced to 55 feet. <br />Under either option, staff and the applicant will have clearly defined expectations; however, this approach may <br />limit the ability for a unique or creative design (see item #4 below) or the ability to cluster smaller lots to <br />preserve large expanses of natural resources (e.g. wetlands, native uplands, oak hammock, etc.). Providing <br />defined limitations on the requested waivers will also help to maintain compatibility with neighboring <br />properties (see item #5 below). <br />Recommendation: Also, while the current PD ordinance does not list building height as a development <br />parameter that may be waived, staff recommends that the BCC and the PZC consider including an affirmative <br />statement within Section 915.15 of the PD ordinance that building height cannot be waived via the PD process. <br />3. Encourage the Inclusion of Affordable and/or Workforce Housing: <br />Over the past few years, housing prices have increased significantly due a number of factors, and finding <br />affordable and/or workforce housing within Indian River County has become increasingly difficult. Staff has <br />discussed the concept of including affordable and/or workforce housing units in new PD projects with a number <br />of potential applicants; however none of those projects have proceeded accordingly. While there are a number <br />of ways to incentivize or encourage the inclusion of affordable and/or workforce housing within new PD <br />projects, staff is providing the following items for further discussion. <br />a. Specify that including affordable and/or workforce housing is the "number one" priority public benefit; <br />b. If a new PD project includes a minimum percentage of affordable and/or workforce housing units (e.g. 25% <br />or 30%), then no other public benefits are required; <br />c. If a minimum project size is adopted for new PD projects (see item #4 below), then allow new PD projects <br />that include a minimum percentage of affordable and/or workforce housing units on project sites smaller <br />Indian River County, Florida Page 3 of 5 Printed on 10/17/2025 <br />powered I lagistarT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.