Laserfiche WebLink
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes - Final September 10, 2025 <br />vote: <br />Aye: 5 - Chairman Flescher, Vice Chairman Loar, Commissioner Adams, Commissioner <br />Earman, and Commissioner Moss <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing. <br />Allison Giordano, President of Water's Edge Homeowner's Association, addressed <br />the Board regarding an upcoming assessment of $454 per homeowner per year for <br />15 years. The development consists of 86 homes in total. She was in procession of a <br />letter from their attorney that presented strong arguments, supported by Case Law <br />and State Statutes, explaining why the homeowners should not bear the full <br />assessment. She continued, the issue involved a road crossing over a culvert, which <br />affected not only the homeowners in Water's Edge but also those living along First <br />Street Southwest. Therefore, the assessment should not be assigned solely to the <br />residents of Water's Edge. <br />Ms. Giordano reported that the total assessment of $537,000 included an $80,000 <br />contingency discussed during the August 12th meeting, of which very little had been <br />used. She informed the Board that an email indicated at least $60,000 represented a <br />cost savings. Consequently, the numbers they received should be adjusted <br />downwards by these amounts. <br />Ms. Giordano referenced an email that was taken out of context, highlighting that <br />Water's Edge acknowledged their awareness of the County's plans to construct the <br />culvert and understood there would be some form of assessment on their properties. <br />However, they never agreed to be solely assessed, nor to the amount of the <br />assessment. Additionally, she mentioned an email from Dylan Reingold, dated <br />December 16, 2022, at 4:15 p.m. In that email, he stated that there was funding <br />available to replace the culverts at both entranceways to Water's Edge, as well as <br />those that crossed First Street Southwest. However, he emphasized that an <br />agreement needed to be established first. At that time, the County Attorney indicated <br />that there was money allocated in the budget. She pointed out that on the same day, <br />former Public Works Director Rich Szpyrka stated that the County was not <br />responsible for addressing issues outside of the pipe replacement under the <br />driveways. This suggested to the residents that the pipes under the driveways, which <br />were public roads maintained by the County (as they were turned over in 2006), were <br />indeed the County's responsibility. The culverts at these two entrances were also the <br />County's responsibility, yet the residents were being assessed for them. She explained <br />that once the project was completed, the County would assume responsibility for the <br />maintenance of those culverts going forward. If the County planned to take over this <br />responsibility in the future, the residents questioned why they were not doing so at that <br />time. <br />Indian River County, Florida Page 19 <br />