DELETE (3) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes-Final December 9,2025 Vice Chairman Moss asked about the potential for rate decreases.County Administrator Titkanich responded and clarified that,while the rates remained set, supplemental fees had varied.He emphasized that the commercial rates remained competitive relative to neighboring counties and noted that the increase was a necessary adjustment following a decade of low rates. Administrator Titkanich inquired whether WM would waive the$100 fee for distributing approximately 5,000 carts.Mr.Mehta clarified that,while 5,000 yard waste carts had been reserved,they remained undelivered due to specific communities had received an exemption.The collection of this fee was still necessary as part of the non-ad valorem assessment program,which involved collecting the assessment through residents'tax bills.Under the Franchise Agreement,WM was obligated to be prepared to provide service to the community each day,even though the community had opted out of yard waste service. This scenario mirrored previous franchise agreements in which communities had used their own yard waste companies and paid service charges directly to WM.Those communities had opted not to allow WM to collect yard waste,preferring to hire their own landscapers. Additionally,WM agreed that during the one-year period,if another 5,000 residents outside the exempt communities required a second yard waste cart,the current$100 delivery fee would be waived.However,residents would need to agree to an extra$10 monthly fee for the second cart,as specified in the amendment regarding benefits for exempt communities.Mr.Mehta further clarified that there was no mechanism to credit the$100 to exempt communities. Chairman Loar stated that,in his understanding,the 5,001st customer would be required to pay the$100 fee for a new yard waste cart.To the Administrator's point,those 5,000 carts had already been effectively paid for.The key takeaway was that WM was already being compensated by those 5,000 customers who were not receiving the services. Luigi Pace of Waste Management addressed the Board,stating that he did not have the authority to agree to any changes from those initially discussed and negotiated with Mr.Mehta.If the Board desired to make any changes,Mr.Pace would need to seek permission and approval to proceed. Chairman Loar requested a motion to bring this Item back in January 2026. II Commissioner Flescher believed it would be appropriate and in the public's best interest. A motion was made by Commissioner Flescher,seconded by Vice Chairman Moss,to postpone the discussion until the January 13, 2026, BCC Meeting. The motion carried by the following vote: Indian River County,Florida Page 23