My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/21/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
1/21/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:02 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:22:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANALYSIS <br />In this section, an analysis of the reasonableness of the <br />application will be presented. The analysis will include a <br />description of: <br />• concurrency of public facilities; <br />• compatibility with the surrounding area; <br />• consistency with the comprehensive plan; and <br />• potential impact on environmental quality. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The comprehensive plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The comprehensive plan also requires that new development be <br />reviewed to ensure that the minimum acceptable standards for these <br />services and facilities are maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For rezoning requests, conditional concurrency review is <br />required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since rezoning <br />requests are not projects, county regulations call for the <br />concurrency review to be based upon the most intense use of the <br />subject property based upon the requested zoning district. For <br />commercial rezoning requests, the most intense use (according to <br />the county's land development regulations) is retail commercial <br />with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per acre of land <br />proposed for rezoning. The site information used for the <br />concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: *11.3 acres <br />2. <br />Land Use <br />Designation: C/I, <br />Commercial/Industrial <br />3. <br />Existing <br />Zoning Classification: <br />CL, Limited Commercial <br />4. Proposed Zoning Classification: CG, General Commercial <br />5. Most Intense Use under Existing Zoning Classification: <br />*113,000 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in <br />the 5th Edition ITE Manual). <br />6. Most Intense Use under Proposed Zoning Classification: <br />±113, 000 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in <br />the 5th Edition ITE Manual). <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of <br />the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not <br />increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency <br />requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency <br />review because the requested zoning would not increase the use <br />intensity of the site. <br />By changing the zoning of the subject property from CL to CG, some <br />commercial uses not currently allowed would be permitted on the <br />3 <br />BOOK i - wE 3i <br />January 21, 1997 8 <br />O <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.