My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/21/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
1/21/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:02 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:22:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F_ <br />Commissioner Adams found it odd that under CL or CG, one <br />zoning category allowed a drive-through discount beverage store and <br />the other did not. She felt the existing drive-through discount <br />beverage store was the grossest, nastiest looking place and that <br />beautiful oak trees had been cut down to accommodate it. <br />Commissioner Macht commented that the Board had not paid <br />enough attention to transition zoning and they needed to pay more <br />attention to it. <br />Chairman Eggert pointed out that many shopping centers exist <br />surrounded by multiple -family housing. Commissioner Macht <br />commented that multiple -family is a transition. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. <br />Attorney Bruce Barkett advised that he was present on behalf <br />of the applicant and was available to answer any questions. He <br />commented that the request for rezoning is compatible with the <br />Comprehensive Plan and surrounding land use. It is at an <br />intersection that is undergoing improvement in both directions. He <br />advised that when talking of transition zoning, you start at the <br />busiest intersection with the most intense zoning. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the <br />Chairman closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Ginn, to adopt the ordinance in <br />accordance with staff's recommendation. <br />Commissioner Tippin wanted to be sure the rare magnolia tree <br />in the area is preserved and not destroyed during construction. <br />Attorney Barkett thought that the tree was on Department of <br />Transportation (DOT) right-of-way. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED THE QUESTION and the motion <br />carried unanimously. (Ordinance No. 97-02 adopted) <br />Commissioner Adams requested that staff be directed to pursue <br />with DOT to save the magnolia tree. <br />42 bwx lui -f$a &8 <br />January 21, 1997 <br />� � r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.