Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />- Drainage <br />All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater <br />regulations which require on-site retention, preservation of <br />floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In <br />addition, development proposals must meet the discharge <br />requirements of the county Stormwater Management Ordinance. Since <br />the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian <br />River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the <br />property will be prohibited from discharging any runoff in excess <br />of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the approved <br />IRFWCD discharge rate. <br />In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service <br />standards do not apply, since the property does not lie within a <br />floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge <br />standards apply. With the most intense use of this site under the <br />proposed zoning district, the maximum area of impervious surface <br />would be approximately 507,038 square feet, or 11.6 acres. The <br />maximum runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface <br />and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given the IRFWCD two inch <br />discharge requirement, would be approximately 585,432 cubic feet. <br />In order to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the <br />applicant would be required to retain approximately 444,363 cubic <br />feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the <br />subject property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff <br />rate is 157.05 cubic feet/second. <br />Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level of service standard <br />would be met by limiting off-site discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum <br />discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and requiring <br />retention of 444,363 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use <br />of the property. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted <br />during the development approval process. <br />- Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand <br />that would result from the most intense development that could <br />occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates <br />that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table <br />below illustrates the additional park demand associated with the <br />proposed development of the property and the existing surplus <br />acreage by park type. <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all <br />concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid <br />waste, recreation, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the <br />proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been <br />satisfied for the subject request. <br />50 <br />January 21, 1997 <br />LOS <br />Project <br />(Acres per <br />Demand <br />Surplus <br />Par); Type <br />1000 population) <br />(Acres -Y <br />Acreage <br />Urban District <br />5.0 <br />1.34 <br />170.661 <br />Community (north) <br />3.0 <br />0.80 <br />15.895 <br />Beach <br />1.,5---- -- - - <br />0.40 <br />61.598 <br />River <br />1.5-- <br />0.40 - <br />22.595 <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all <br />concurrency -mandated facilities, including drainage, roads, solid <br />waste, recreation, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the <br />proposed zoning district. Therefore, the concurrency test has been <br />satisfied for the subject request. <br />50 <br />January 21, 1997 <br />