My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/28/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
1/28/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:02 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:23:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/28/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
represented by the Public Defender of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit because <br />of conflict of interest or excessive caseloadof the Public Defender. Proposals <br />were to be made in two categories: 1) non -capital felonies and 2) misdemeanors <br />and juveniles. <br />The closing date for submittals was December 2, 1996. Two proposals were <br />received for each category. The proposals were made by James T. Long, P.A. <br />and Gerald T. Roden. <br />Pursuant to the RFP these proposals were reviewed by a committee comprised <br />of acting Chief Judge Kanarek, John Unruh representing the Public Defender, <br />James Chandler and myself. Mr. Long's proposal was for $600 for felony cases <br />and $300 for misdemeanor and juvenile cases. This is the same as the current <br />contract and the same cost since January 1993. Mr. Roden's proposal was for <br />$580 for felony cases and $280 for misdemeanor and juvenile. On average, Mr. <br />Roden's proposal would be about $6,000 less a year than the Long proposal. <br />Mr. Long's proposal also included as participating attorneys Kay Hammond, <br />Bruce Smith, Richard Saliba and Wayne McDonough. Mr. Roden's proposal <br />included Stephen Fromang as the participating attorney. <br />The Committee reviewed the criminal experience of each group and concluded <br />that Mr. Long's group had extensive criminal experience and had generally <br />done a good job during the previous contract period. Mr. Roden's experience is <br />very limited in criminal law and he has no recent experience (last two years) in <br />criminal law. Judge Kanarek and Mr. Unruh felt that experience was a very <br />important factor not only from a legal standpoint but from a financial one as <br />well. It was pointed out that when an issue of in -effective counsel is raised it <br />can become a very expensive proceeding to the County. <br />It was the consensus of the Committee that the experience of Mr. Long's group <br />far outweighed the difference in case cost. Accordingly, the Committee <br />recommends that Mr. Long's proposal for both categories be accepted by the <br />Board of County Commissioners and Mr. Long be awarded the contract for the <br />year 1997 and authorize the Chairman to execute the attached agreement. <br />A copy of each proposal is attached for your information. <br />TPO/sw <br />cc: Chief Judge Paul B. Kanarek <br />John Unruh, Assistant Public Defender <br />James Chandler, County Administrator <br />Charles P. Vitunac, County Attorney <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously accepted <br />the proposals by James T. Long and authorized the <br />Chairman to execute the contract agreement. <br />AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />19 <br />JANUARY 28, 1997 eou� F,,;; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.