My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/3/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
2/3/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:02 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:24:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/03/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Development of Customer Base <br />Utilities Director Terry Pinto emphasize that fire flow <br />capacity determines the requirements for water capacity. <br />Commissioner Tippin recalled that the Board authorized <br />expansion of the utilities department because DEP said we were at <br />some percentage of capacity vs dry lines. <br />Director Pinto stated that the department was below 50% <br />capacity but DEP said the county was maxed out. Negotiations were <br />held with DEP and we refused to sign the part of the permit that <br />said we had that amount of committed flow. The Comp Plan requires <br />that when we use 50% of our capacity, we have to start designing <br />the next expansion and when we reach 80%, we have to start <br />construction. This is a self-supporting utility which only <br />collects what we need to pay required expenses. Impact fees are <br />also an expense requirement covering the cost of providing new <br />capacity for new customers. Studies which indicate that our fees <br />are high in comparison to other counties do not take into account <br />that our system is entirely new while some communities have <br />facilities which were built many years ago. Also, other counties <br />have impact fees which are called by other names. <br />In response to Commissioner Ginn's question regarding the use <br />of revenue bonds, Director Pinto explained that in many instances <br />even though there are existing utilities which are taken over by <br />the county, the customers are still new customers and the county <br />has to provide new capacity. The County has set up a 10 -year <br />payment plan without incurring the funding cost of setting up <br />bonds. <br />17 FU -e,. <br />FEBRUARY 3, 1997 <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.