Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
1 <br />CHART C (Revised 2/13/97) <br />CONCERN: OTHER COMPATIBILITY ASPECTS <br />strategies for oxmpatibility <br />ExistRegulations <br />Drafted Regulation Changes <br />Additional Alternativea <br />1. Restrict general locations of new <br />a. Variousheights of towers allowed in <br />Reg. 1 <br />Various heights of towers allowed in <br />Alt. 1 <br />Restrict new towers over 150' tall to AG - <br />tower sites. <br />various zoning districts. Towers over <br />various zoning districts. Towers over <br />2 and AG -3 areas. <br />140' tall allowed in agricultural and <br />150' tall allowed in agricultural and <br />industrial districts only, by special <br />industrial districts only, by special <br />Alt. 2 <br />Further restrict districts in which <br />exception. In residential districts, <br />exception. In residential districts <br />various heights of towers are allowed. <br />must be accessory to residential use <br />must be accessory to residential use <br />(i.e.: amateur radio). <br />(i.e.: amateur radio) or a camouflaged <br />tower. <br />Reg. 2 <br />Requires special exception use <br />approval and more <br />restrictions/criteria for towers 701 <br />to 150, on sites within 1 mile of <br />Urban Service Area. <br />2. Separate new tower sites from <br />a. 110% fall radius or design fall radius <br />Reg. 3 <br />Specifies setbacks from property <br />Alt. 3 <br />Require increased setbacks from property <br />residences and rights-of-way. <br />(de -facto setback). <br />boundaries and applies building code <br />boundaries and/or residences and rights - <br />wind loading requirements. <br />of -way (Orange). <br />b. Criterion to consider impact on nearby <br />subdivisions. <br />Alt. 4 <br />(Incentive) Allow taller towers on large <br />county owned sites (regardless of zoning) <br />where significant setbacks from existing <br />and potential future residences can be <br />required/ensured. <br />3. Avoid tower site clustering: <br />a. Not addressed. <br />Not addressed. <br />Alt. 5 <br />Require special setbacks (750' - 5,0001) <br />disperse tower locations. <br />between towers by tower height and type <br />[Orange]. <br />Alt. 6 <br />Apply 2 mile separation requirement <br />between non -camouflaged, single tower <br />user (Napa]. <br />4. *Limit the amount of time new <br />a. Remove if abandoned for more than 12 <br />Reg. 4 <br />Remove if abandoned for more than 12 <br />Alt. 7 <br />Require applicant to execute a removal <br />towers are allowed to stand. <br />continuous months (not in ordinance, <br />continuous months (not in ordinance, <br />agreement with county for towers of <br />current policy). <br />current policy). <br />significant size [Napa). <br />Alt. 6 <br />Grant 10 year approvals for towers of <br />significant size. Renewal request may be <br />denied at end of 10 years if tower no <br />longer substantially complies, or is not <br />made to comply, with up-to-date <br />regulations. If renewal request is <br />denied, tower must be removed under Alt. <br />7 removal agreement [Napa]. <br />Key: Alternatives Used By Other Local Governments <br />Altamonte: City of Altamonte Springs, Florida Cobb: Cobb County, Georgia Hialeah: City of Hialeah, Florida <br />Napa: Napa County, California Orange: Orange County, Florida Palm Beach: Palm Beach County, Florida <br />San Francisco: City & County of San Francisco, California <br />*Note: Eliminating an existing tower could also eliminate a potential, future co -location opportunity. <br />ONECESSARY BOARD ACTION: None of the "Drafted Regulation Changes" or "Additional Alternatives" listed are mutually <br />exclusive. The Board should decide which if any, or (perhaps all) of the 4 changes and 8 alternatives it would like <br />the formal LDR changes to address. <br />0 <br />o <br />C.d <br />3 <br />rra <br />tl <br />