Laserfiche WebLink
objection based on the fact that the county's EAR had not yet been <br />determined to be sufficient. On February 24, 1997, DCA determined <br />that the county's EAR was sufficient. Therefore, that objection <br />has been addressed, and the county may amend its comprehensive <br />plan. <br />Concurrency of Public Facilities <br />This site is located within the county Urban Service Area, an area <br />deemed suited for urban scale development. The Comprehensive Plan <br />establishes standards for: Transportation, Potable Water, <br />Wastewater, Solid Waste, Drainage and Recreation (Future Land Use <br />Policy 3.1). The adequate provision of these services is necessary <br />to ensure the continued quality of life enjoyed by the community. <br />The Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations also <br />require that new development be reviewed to ensure that the minimum <br />acceptable standards for these services and facilities are <br />maintained. <br />Policy 3.2 of the Future Land Use Element states that no <br />development shall be approved unless it is consistent with the <br />concurrency management system component of the Capital Improvements <br />Element. For Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests, <br />conditional concurrency review is required. <br />Conditional concurrency review examines the available capacity of <br />each facility with respect to a proposed project. Since <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests are not <br />projects, county regulations call for the concurrency review to -be <br />based upon the most intense use of the subject property based upon <br />the requested zoning district or land use designation. For <br />commercial Comprehensive Plan amendment requests, the most intense <br />use (according to the county's Land Development Regulations) is <br />retail commercial with 10,000 square feet of gross floor area per <br />acre -of land proposed for redesignation. The site information used <br />for the concurrency analysis is as follows: <br />1. Size of Area to be <br />Redesignated and Rezoned: <br />2. Existing Land Use Designation: <br />115.02 acres <br />L-1, Low -Density <br />Residential - 1 (up to 3 <br />units/acre) <br />3. Proposed Land Use Designation: C/ I, Commercial - <br />Industrial <br />ommercial- <br />Industrial Node <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject <br />Property under Current <br />Land Use Designation: <br />120 Dwelling Onits <br />S. Most Intense Use of Subject Property under Proposed Land Use <br />Designation: 150,200 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial <br />(Shopping Center in the 5th Edition ITE Manual). <br />- Transportation <br />A review of the traffic impacts that would result from the <br />development of the property indicates that the existing level of <br />service D or better on 58th Avenue and other impacted roads would <br />not be lowered. The site information used for determining traffic <br />impacts is as follows: <br />Existing Land IIse Designation <br />1. Residential Use Identified in 5th Edition ITE Manual: <br />Single -Family <br />2. For Single -Family Units in 5th Edition ITE Manual: <br />a. Average Weekday Trip Ends: 10.1/unit <br />b. P.M. Peak Hour Trip Ends: 1.01/unit <br />C. Inbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 65% <br />i. Southbound- (P.M. Peak Hour): 52.5% <br />ii. Northbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 47.5% <br />d. Outbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 35% <br />i. Southbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 47.5% <br />ii. Northbound (P.M. Peak Hour): 52.5% <br />3. Peak Direction of 58th Avenue, from 16th Street to SR 60: <br />Southbound <br />MARCH 189 1997 <br />29 <br />Pa®r 100 PACEM2 <br />