My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/18/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
3/18/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:03 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:55:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/18/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
parcels that are 5 acres or more, the county's native upland plant <br />community set aside requirement does not apply. Single-family <br />residential development on lots that are 1 acre or less are exempt <br />from the county's tree removal and land clearing permit <br />requirements. In contrast, all commercial and multiple -family <br />development is subject to the county's tree removal and land <br />clearing permit requirements. For these reasons, no adverse <br />environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Surrounded by a 130.3 acre regional shopping center and abutting a <br />major road, the subject property is more appropriate for commercial <br />uses than for residential uses. Based on the analysis, staff has <br />determined that the requested land use designation and zoning <br />district are compatible with surrounding• areas, consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan, meet all concurrency criteria, will have no <br />negative impacts on environmental quality, and meet all applicable <br />land use designation amendment and rezoning criteria. Finally, <br />DCA's sufficiency determination of the county's EAR addresses the <br />one ORC Report objection. For these reasons, staff supports the <br />request. <br />Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve this <br />request to redesignate the subject property to C/I and rezone the <br />subject property to CG. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating advised that this <br />is one of the five items considered by Planning and Zoning on <br />September 26, 1996 and submitted to the Board for approval on <br />November 21, 1996. All amendments were submitted to the Department <br />of Community Affairs on January 30, 1997 and the DCA issued its <br />Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report on each <br />amendment. The DCA filed one objection, that the County could not <br />amend its Comp Plan until its EAR (Evaluation and Appraisal Report) <br />was approved. On February 24, 1997 the DCA determined that the <br />County's EAR was sufficient. The Board is now allowed to take <br />action on each amendment. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone <br />wished to be heard in this matter. There being none, she closed <br />the public hearing. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously adopted <br />Ordinance 97-008 amending the land use element of <br />the Comprehensive Plan by changing the land use <br />designation for ± 4.6 acres located on the North <br />side of S.R. 60 at 63rd Court from M-1 to C/I and <br />providing severability and effective date. <br />MARCH 189 1997 63 BOOK 100 PAGE 936 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.