My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/15/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
4/15/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 9:59:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/15/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
&o9r, 1 1 FACE 128 <br />Jeff Sluggett, representative for Nextel Communications and <br />Sprint Spectrum, felt this will be a very good set of regulations <br />which will protect residents and provide for users. Mr. Sluggett <br />suggested that the exemptions cited on Page 18 of the proposed <br />ordinance be expanded to include situations where reduced distances <br />between towers would be allowed, and that the second bullet on <br />Page 16 should list a minimum of 2 users. <br />Sheri Brower, representing amateur radio operators, stated <br />that 70 feet used to be the arbitrary limit for their use. 70 feet <br />does not give the average user access to effective communication, <br />especially when co -locating UHF and/or VHF antennae. During an <br />emergency, such as a hurricane, users would need both types of <br />antenna and 80 feet would give an adequate range for both long <br />distance and short distance communications. <br />The Chairman asked if anyone else wished to be heard in this <br />matter. There being none, she closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Adams felt a little uncomfortable with the <br />regulations for "grandfathered" towers, and Chairman Eggert <br />suggested that not allowing the setbacks to be decreased would be <br />a means of control. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Ginn, the Board unanimously directed y <br />staff to make revisions to the ordinance to <br />incorporate a clause that setback requirements <br />cannot be decreased on "grandfathered" towers; add a <br />better definition of "utility transmission" lines; <br />include a reference to the FEMA regulations; include <br />language to incorporate Mr. Sluggett's comments <br />regarding adding an exemption to the separation <br />distance requirement in cases where obeying the rule <br />would require companies to build more towers; <br />invoked the pending ordinance doctrine for the <br />revised ordinance; and approved May 6, 1997 as the <br />date for adoption of this ordinance, pursuant to <br />staff's -recommendations. <br />APRIL 15, 1997 16 <br />� a � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.