Laserfiche WebLink
M M M <br />buildable portion of a lot. <br />density. <br />Chairman Eggert noted the illustrations on page 106 showed the differences in planting <br />A brief discussion was held about setbacks and buffers along SR -60. <br />Commissioner Ginn reiterated her desire to have larger buffers now while it is still possible. If <br />it becomes a problem for someone developing their particular site, then she thought a variance might be <br />the solution. She thought the buffer should be increased to 30 feet, but nothing less than 15 feet, along <br />the corridor. <br />Commissioner Adams thought that setting something so far back might create a traffic hazard <br />when people were slowing in traffic trying to find where to turn. <br />Commissioner Ginn pointed out that there are regulations for signs and where the landscaping <br />would be placed. She again asked that the buffer be 30 fit. She also wanted a requirement in the <br />plan to disallow wood fencing because it deteriorates quickly. <br />Mr. Waddell stated that wood fencing would implicitly be prohibited because the fence must <br />match the texture of the building and frame -sided buildings are not allowed. <br />Next Commissioner Ginn inquired about asphalt roofing, and Director Boling advised that it <br />would be allowed on residential but not on commercial development. She saw nothing wrong with one <br />asphalt roof at a particular site and thought it very attractive. <br />Mr. Roseland commented that trying to address each and every pout in the guideline would <br />result in 100+ pages. It was more effective to prohibit asphalt shingles. He felt this was something the <br />review committee could possibly look at, but pointed out that even 40 -year shingles, fungus resistant, <br />have a stained appearance. He felt it would be much better to eliminate them <br />Commissioner Ginn was generally pleased with the plan, but wanted to see a larger buffer. <br />Chairman Eggert opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard. <br />AVonso TrW i, 32 Plantation Drive, Apt. 202, representing Vista Plantation, generally <br />approved the plan. He felt that better lighting at the entrances of the mall and other stores is necessary. <br />He stated it was difficult at night in a rainstorm to pick out the entrances. He thought it was a serious <br />matter that should be brought to the attention of the State's Public Works Department. <br />Eric "Rip" Wheeler, 420 Coconut Palm Road, Vero Beach, president-elect of the Realtors <br />Association of Indian River County, spoke on behalf of the Board of Directors and the membership. <br />He read from a prepared statement which supported the creation and plan, but pointed out that private <br />property rights should not be infiinged upon. <br />33 <br />April 22, 1997 <br />BOOK 10i PAGE 2-11 <br />