My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/22/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
4/22/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:04:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/22/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK Ni'AGE <br />explained that a very detailed and labor-intensive process is involved to prepare the plans and that the <br />sign was anon -illuminated fagade sign. The cost and delay is associated with the actual architectural <br />plans and specifications for the building materials for the building itself In response to Commissioner <br />Ginn, he advised that this was not a prototypical Sam's store. <br />John Binkley, a local architect, advised of his role in the development in the proposed plan. <br />He supported the task force on having done a great job. He stated that the planhadbeen drawn up <br />subjectively so that staff could review submitted plans and reach a definitive `yes" or "no". He felt a 4 - <br />person <br />person review committee was unnecessary. He cautioned that if members change each year, *the <br />members will have different perspectives. He preferred to see it handled by staff review only. He felt <br />there was a great deal of flexibility in the plan and that most .developers will be willing to comply and <br />spend a few extra dollars to make a more attractive building. It will stop the "cookie cutter" chain <br />buildings and force the developer to provide the community with a well thought out aesthetically <br />pleasing end result. With respect to the expansion of the buffer width, he felt that on small lots it <br />would place undue hardship on a developer and the Board may want to look at increasing the setback <br />requirement with caution on the smaller parcels in particular. He urged approval of the plan. <br />George Blythe advised that he had attended about 50% of the committee's meetings. He <br />agreed with Commissioner Ginn's desire to have a 30 -foot buffer and felt that made a lot of sense. The <br />next properties to be developed will be on the south side of SR -60, west of 8e Avenue, which are <br />extremely deep. He agreed with Mr. Bmkley regarding required set backs on small lots and suggested <br />that perhaps an adjustment could be dependent upon the depth of the property. He did not mind <br />looking like Boca Raton or Palm Beach. <br />In closing, Mr. Blythe asked the Commission to consider setting up a task force to consider I- <br />95 where the travelling public in Florida looks at Indian River County and makes judgments as to <br />whether it would be a nice place to do business and live. <br />I& Waddell stated that most of the undeveloped properties out on SR -60 will be developed by <br />out-of-town owners and large retailers, not local mom-and-pop stores. The County will be dealing <br />with non -locals and their tendency is to build what they build everywhere and leave, and then the <br />citizens are stuck looking at all that for the next 50 years. He disputed using primary colors by <br />showing photographic examples of typical buildings. He also showed examples of a 24 -foot fagade <br />sign. Of the numerous technical reviews he has sax through, the developers have willingly acquiesced <br />to the County's requirements. He predicted that developers will come and play by our rules. The <br />committee has tried very hard not to restrict the use of the property and to give a very broad acceptable <br />spectrum of colors and freedom to architects to design. <br />Chairman Eggert asked if a 3 -person review committee will be sufficient for the summer, and <br />Mr. Waddell felt it would be. He also commented that staff is doing such a wonderful job, that most of <br />what the review committee would do has already been done by staff. He added, however, that if we <br />38 <br />April 22, 1997 <br />M M - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.