My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/22/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
4/22/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:04:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/22/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l <br />809 101 PAGE ��, � <br />� <br />the future. She wanted the wordtive na(plants) removed and also <br />"Y . " ` wanted to make sure that <br />continuing maintenance of landscaping plants is required. She emphasized that she has made an effort <br />to not sell her plants in Indian River County. <br />Commissioner Adams set out the points she wanted to include in a motion to adopt the SR -60 <br />Corridor Plan, as follows: Consider the buffer setback relating to size of property; delete the word <br />"native"; investigate increasing lights at entrances, consider the four-sided fagade, and invoke the <br />pending ordinance doctrine. With respect to the task force (review committee) continuance, she <br />warned at least one resident and one business owner included on the committee. <br />A brief discussion was held concerning whether or not the members of the committee met the <br />business owner criteria. <br />Commissioner Adams was happy with members Tom Foster, Mr. Waddell, and Mr. Roseland. <br />She did not agree with the proposal that Karl Hedin be included on the committee, because he is an <br />elected official, and that would add another dimension. <br />Tom Foster, Vice Chairman of the task force, was concerned that a business person <br />serving on the committee might have to review an application of a competitor. <br />Commissioner Adams and Chairman Eggert pointed out that the review committee would <br />simply be advisory and would not vote. Commissioner Ginn thought that the three members and <br />staff would be sufficient, but would like to see the addition of a landscape architect on the review <br />committee. The three discussed it and decided to wait on adding a fourth member. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Ginn, to approve staffis recommendations with the <br />following amendments to the proposed SR 60 Corridor Plan: <br />1) consider buffer setback change relating to size of property; <br />2) investigate increasing lighting at entrances to shopping areas; <br />3) consider fagade of buildings; <br />4) delete the word "native" in relation to landscaping; and <br />5) invoke the pending ordinance doctrine. <br />no] <br />April 22, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.