Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Division Director Stan Boling presented the revised Ordinance and <br />requested authorization for staff to advertise a Request For Qualifications regarding the <br />proposed consulting engineer. <br />Commissioner Ginn inquired whether a request for a special exception would <br />require a public hearing, and Director Boling responded that it would. <br />Commissioner Adams felt that she could be comfortable with the ordinance except <br />for allowing antenna attachments on the 69KB and larger utility transmission towers in <br />residential areas. She would support that provision as long as they were only allowed in <br />agricultural/industrial areas, but not in residential areas. <br />Director Boling believed the County would not have any way to enforce that provision. <br />Commissioner Macht remarked that utility companies are guaranteed the right of <br />eminent domain in order to transmit power but did not believe they would have the authority <br />to make other use of the properties. <br />County Attorney Vitunac believed the County could go to court and try to enforce the <br />provisions but this would be a new area. <br />Commissioner Ginn was not comfortable with the ordinance as presented and <br />preferred to wait until she had an opportunity to hear Dr. Eugene Webb tomorrow at the <br />Treasure Coast Council of Local Governments. <br />Chairman Eggert reminded the Commissioners that they are now in the middle of <br />the second public hearing. <br />County Attorney Vitunac agreed that adding more height to an already ugly structure <br />is not good but emphasized that federal law gives utility companies the right to build the <br />towers if needed for service and prohibits counties from prohibiting or restricting the <br />construction of their towers. <br />Director Boling stressed that the exemption in the ordinance is just for any utility pole <br />that supports a 69KB line with an antenna structure up to 150 feet in height. The existing <br />code is silent on this issue. <br />Commissioner Macht felt the provision should be left in the ordinance and the <br />County should go ahead with the challenge. <br />County Attorney Vitunac then reminded the Board that several years ago the County <br />had attempted to adopt a bill that would give notice to the County when 69KB or higher <br />lines were going into a residential neighborhood and the Legislature would not even allow a <br />public hearing. <br />Commissioner Macht felt the communication antenna issue is not the same thing <br />and would not fall under the original purview of granting eminent domain rights to transmit <br />power. <br />County Attorney Vitunac felt the question at this point in time is whether the County <br />can stop them from erecting antennae which other people will use. <br />MAY 69 1997 51 <br />