My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/20/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
5/20/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:09:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/20/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6001( 101 <br />The Board established the 120 foot buffer/setback based on the <br />depth of the property for which the comprehensive plan amendment <br />was approved. Since the referenced property had a depth of 1,320 <br />feet, the Board considered 1,200 feet to be an adequate development <br />distance, and 120 feet to be a sufficient setback/buffer amount. <br />Consequently, the Board adopted 120 feet as the interim <br />setback/buffer distance and directed staff to determine if this was <br />appropriate. <br />In recent years, Indian River County has transitioned from a rural <br />area to an urban county. As one of the principal citrus producing <br />counties in the state, however, Indian River County still has many <br />producing groves within its urban service area. Recognizing that <br />conflicts occur when residential projects develop adjacent to <br />agricultural operations, the county established agriculture/ <br />residential setback/buffer requirements several years ago. These <br />existing regulations apply to new development. <br />New Residential Development Adjacent to Active Agricultural Uses <br />Existing county regulations require newly created lots in <br />subdivisions to have either extra setbacks or special buffering <br />between new residences and active agricultural operations. "Active <br />agricultural operations-"- include citrus groves, orchards, field <br />crops, and truck farming. The developer or property owner creating <br />the new lots must provide a special separation distance or buffer <br />between new residential dwellings and the adjacent, active <br />agricultural operation; -as follows: - -" - <br />1. For projects zoned for 1 unit per acre or less, the <br />developer/owner shall establish a 50' building (residence) <br />setback and a Type "B" buffer with 6' opaque feature (see <br />attachment #2). <br />2. For projects zoned for more than 1 unit per acre, the <br />developer/owner shall: <br />a. Establish a 50' building (residence) setback with no <br />buffer required, or <br />b. Establish a 25' buffer yard with a Type "B" buffer and 6' <br />opaque feature (see attachment #2). <br />These setback and buffer requirements have been applied since the <br />late 198o's. Included among the subdivisions where these <br />requirements were applied are "Laurel Oaks," (north boundary) and <br />"Stonebridge" (east, south, and west boundaries). Staff has not <br />received any complaints from residents of those subdivisions. <br />New Agricultural Research Facilities <br />Existing county regulations allow new agricultural research <br />facilities only on property designated as agricultural or rural on <br />the county's land use plan map. The developer/owner of any such <br />new facility is required to provide: <br />1. A 50' setback from structures and test plots to residential <br />Property; or <br />2. A 30' bufferyard with a "Type A" buffer (see attachment #3), <br />between structures -and -test plots and residential property. <br />Host Plant Prohibition <br />Over the last two years, the-- County has applied to special <br />exception use projects a policy of requiring new developments near <br />agricultural areas to prohibit caribbean Emit fly host plants. <br />Examples of projects where such prohibitions were required by the <br />County are: Harvest Christian Ranch, Trails- End Planned <br />Development, and Stonebridge North Planned Development. That <br />Policy was recommended- -in --the- -approved- Eva-3xation--and --Appraisal <br />Report (EAR). In the near future, that policy will be -formally <br />adopted and incorporated --in- the--comprehensive--plan and land <br />development regulations (LDRs). <br />Summary <br />Current county regulations require residential developers to <br />provide special setbacks or -buffers between homes on new lots and <br />adjacent active.agr-.cultural---operations._ Such requirements apply <br />MAY 20, 1997 <br />18 <br />® M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.