My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/20/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
5/20/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:09:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/20/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roof, 101 FAA85 <br />In the county's comprehensive plan, the Urban Service Area boundary <br />identifies the urban growth limits for the plan's 20 year horizon. <br />Generally, this boundary should provide a clear separation between <br />urban uses and rural/agricultural uses. For various reasons, <br />including the county's encouragement for agricultural uses within <br />the urban service area to remain, the boundary does not provide <br />that clear urban/rural separation. Nevertheless, there are <br />important differences between a residential development being <br />adjacent to an active agricultural operation within the Urban <br />Service Area and a similar situation outside of the Urban Service <br />Area. <br />The first difference concerns the long-range use of the properties. <br />Although the comprehensive plan and county LDRs recognize the <br />economic and open space benefits of agriculture within the Urban <br />Service Area, that land is eventually expected to be converted to <br />urban uses,. usually -residential. The county bases its long-range <br />planning (including planning for infrastructure, capital <br />improvements, hurricane evacuation, and future budgets) on the <br />assumption that such conversion of land will ult1mately occur. <br />Because many owners of active agricultural land within the Urban <br />Service Area eventually plan to develop that land, they often <br />oppose additional development regulations, even when the purpose of <br />those regulations is to protect active agricultural operations. <br />Another difference is_ the equitable treatment of land owners. <br />There is a question regarding to what extent the county should <br />require a property owner. whose. property is -within the Urban Service <br />Area to buffer his land from active agricultural uses when it is <br />anticipated, as reflected in the comprehensive plan, that <br />agricultural land eventually will be converted to a more compatible <br />use. <br />*Analysis of Imvacts <br />As noted in the Descriptions and Conditions section of this staff <br />report, the major adverse impacts on residential development from <br />adjacent agricultural operations involve noise, odors, and <br />spraying. That section also noted that residential development <br />adversely impacts agriculture by increasing incidences of <br />trespassing, vandalism, and caribbean fruit fly host plants. <br />Spraying <br />Spraying is used to apply pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer. <br />As long as the spray remains in the agricultural area, it does not <br />cause incompatibilities with residential uses. When the spray <br />drifts over residential areas, however, several problems often <br />result. The first problem concerns the adverse impacts of the <br />spray on the health of people that are sensitive or allergic to the <br />spray. Another problem is that the spray drift often settles on <br />cars in residential areas. That is a problem because chemicals in <br />the drift sometimes-.damage_car-paint. <br />Both aerial and ground sprayings occur in Indian River County. <br />Aerial spraying is used for applications to extremely large areas <br />or when a pesticide must be applied as soon as possible. Because <br />most groves within the urban service area are too small to warrant <br />it, aerial spraying rarely occurs within the Urban Service Area. <br />Ground sprayings usually involve a motorized sprayer pulled through <br />a grove by a tractor. Most groves are sprayed 1-6 times/year. <br />Most spraying is done during daytime hours. To prevent drift, <br />however, spraying is sometimes done during early morning or <br />nighttime hours. Wind and rain are - less frequent, particularly <br />during the Summer, at those hours. <br />The distance drift can travel is affected by climate conditions, <br />type of sprayer, and the presence of physical barriers. Ground <br />spray drift that is observable with the naked eye can travel <br />approximately 80 feet over an open area. Unobservable drift <br />travels somewhat farther. Knowing that drift will cover trees at <br />the perimeter of groves, most grove operators concentrate spraying <br />in the interior of groves. <br />The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services <br />regulates spraying. To prevent drift, state law prohibits most <br />spraying in Indian River County when the wind speed is over eight <br />miles/hour. <br />MAY 20, 1997 <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.