My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/27/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
5/27/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:04 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:10:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/27/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that the Agriculture Advisory Committee and another committee had voted for the nuisance <br />disclosure. <br />Mr. Adair also believed the distance to the property when spraying needs to be <br />considered regarding the density of the buffer. A planted buffer enhances the value and <br />desirability of the property. He felt that nuisance disclosure may be the more important issue. <br />Debb Robinson, vice president of Laurel Homes, stated that she does not own any <br />property that will be affected. She has concern about development within the urban service <br />-b <br />district. She dismissed Mr. Adair's problem as unique as it exists only there. She gave a lengthy <br />presentation giving facts and figures on development cost increases if certain measures are put <br />into place. She believed it would cause artificial inflation of the property prices. She described <br />in detail the full operation of spraying of citrus groves and reasoned the exposure to adjacent <br />homes is minimal. She pointed out that homeowners also spray for pests. Concerning the noise <br />perspective, she stated that noise is everywhere. She was very much against a nuisance <br />disclaimer, because property will not sell at the additional cost. She felt we must work together <br />for this deal with stormwater management. <br />1VIs. Robinson urged the Commissioners not to increase the setback more than 25'; not to <br />require a nuisance disclaimer, and not to increase the `B" buffer. <br />Nancy Offit, Government Affairs Coordinator for the Realtors Association of Indian <br />River County, echoed the remarks of Ms. Robinson. She mentioned several reasons in speaking <br />against the nuisance disclaimer. She cited several other nuisances such as train whistles and <br />barking dogs, as examples of possible disclaimers. She asked the Commissioners to reconsider <br />and vote against the nuisance disclaimer. <br />Mr. Zorc spoke again briefly in reference to basing the setback on the density and active <br />use of the property. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the public <br />hearing. <br />In response to Chairman Eggert`s inquiry, Director Keating advised that new mobile <br />home parks have to be platted and actually have lots like single family developments, so they <br />would be less dense on the perimeter. <br />Commissioner Adams commented that she gets complaints from all over the county, not <br />just from Fellsmere, but the only area concemed in this issue is the urban service area. One of <br />her real fears is that we have assumed development, because it generates more taxes, is good for <br />26 <br />MAY 279 1997 <br />M M M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.