Laserfiche WebLink
soot," 1011. FACE833 <br />Commissioner Macht stated that he had completely forgotten that the Solid Waste <br />Disposal District was a separate district. <br />Commissioner Tippin agreed that he when thinks "utilities", garbage, sewer, and water <br />are all together. <br />Commissioner Ginn thought that since the Board of County Commissioners sits <br />as the Board of the Solid Waste Disposal District, she could not imagine the vote being any <br />different, but it could be. The Committee has already met, had an orientation meeting and two <br />field trips, one to the Landfill and one to the Water Treatment Plant. She felt that the Utility <br />Advisory Committee was not put together hurriedly. She wished it to remain as it is, but would <br />abide by the wishes of the other members if they wanted to wait for a period of time. The intent <br />is not to be disruptive, but to provide a citizen's group to advise the Commissioners. <br />Chairman Eggert would prefer, for morale in terms of use of staff and until the <br />new department head is in place, that the Committee would sit quiet with respect to Solid Waste <br />Disposal District matters. <br />A brief discussion ensued. <br />County Attorney Charles P. Vitunac recommended that if the Board wished to keep all <br />three functions under the UAC, then the Commissioners, sitting as the Solid Waste Disposal <br />District Board, should have a motion to authorize the Solid Waste Disposal District staff to <br />cooperate with the UAC. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Adams, to record a consensus to proceed as we are going, <br />but that the Landfill would remain at the bottom of the UAC's priorities. <br />Commissioner Ginn thought there need be no fear about the UAC. <br />Chairman Eggert advised that there was no fear whatsoever, but simply a <br />procedure so that the Board's options would remain open this fall. <br />The Chairman called the question and the motion carried <br />unanimously. <br />B.C.1. LETTER OF SUPPORT TO SJRWMD FOR ST. JOHNS <br />WATERWAY (AMERICAN HERITAGE RIVER) <br />The Board reviewed a letter dated June 11, 1997 and other information: <br />30 <br />JUNE 249 1997 <br />