My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/15/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
7/15/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:05 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:01:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/15/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK PACE <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in this matter. <br />John Dean, representing the owner of the property reviewed the following: <br />PRO <br />Special Exception Request <br />Limited size <br />Banks and Financial / Credit uses <br />Located in the PRO zoning district <br />Requested by the Owner <br />Representatives Peter Beuttell <br />and John Dean Architect <br />This request Is an increase to the spectrum of <br />allowable limited uses In PRO zoned properties. <br />john h. dean architect & associates, p.a., a.i.a. <br />June 9, 1997 (Revised 6/27/97) <br />This original application for this Special Exception request would have been better handled if we had <br />applied for a Special Exception rather than a Permitted Use. As it is now, both the PSAC and the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission voted not to recommend the Board of County Commission to support <br />the Permitted Use request. However the recent planning and zoning vote was a three to three tie. <br />What is before you now is not the same request, but a revised request, which modifies the Permitted Use <br />request to a Special Exception request. There is a big difference between a Permitted Use request and a <br />Special Exception request. It is our belief that the Special Exception request is a proper and fitting Use <br />request for the four'of the five parcels of PRO land in our County and that, should any other PRO <br />designation be made in the future by Indian River County on urban principal arterial roads, this Special <br />Exception would be compatible with the intended use of the PRO zone, It also allows for public input <br />should anyone feel the special exception should not be granted. <br />The intended purpose of the PRO zone is by County Code. <br />(a) PRO: Professional office district. The PRO, professional office district, Is designed to <br />encourage the development of vacant land and the redevelopment of blighted or declining <br />residential areas along major thoroughfares in selected areas of the county. The selected areas <br />will be deemed as no longer appropriate for strictly single-family use but which are not <br />considered appropriate for a broad range or commercial uses, as permitted in a commercial <br />zoning district. The PRO district may serve as a buffer between commercial and residential uses <br />or be established in areas in transition from single-family to more intensive land uses. The PRO <br />district shall be limited in size so as not to create or significantly extend strip commercial <br />development. <br />JULY 15, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.