My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/12/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
8/12/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:05 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:05:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/12/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W <br />6. Most Intense Use under Proposed Zoning Classification: <br />±8,200 sq. ft. of Retail Commercial (Shopping Center in <br />the 5th Edition ITE Manual). <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of <br />the County's Land Development Regulations, projects which do not <br />increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency <br />requirements. This rezoning request is exempt from concurrency <br />review because the requested zoning would not increase the use <br />intensity of the site. <br />By changing the zoning of the subject property from CH to CG, some <br />commercial uses not currently allowed would be permitted on the <br />site. However, because the most intense use of the property would <br />be the same with either zoning district, changing the property's <br />zoning from CH to CG would not create additional impacts on any <br />concurrency facilities. <br />In this case, a detailed concurrency analysis will be done in <br />conjunction with site development. That concurrency analysis will <br />address facility service levels and demand. <br />Staff's position is that granting the subject request would <br />decrease the likelihood of incompatibilities associated with site <br />development. Since the subject property is surrounded by CG zoned <br />land, the request is for a continuation of an existing zoning <br />district pattern. <br />Located near major transportation facilities and proximate to <br />residentially designated land, general commercial type development <br />is logical on the subject property and within the subject <br />commercial/industrial node. In fact, the predominant zoning within <br />the subject node is CG, particularly along SR 60 and between 82°d <br />Avenue and 98th Avenue. <br />For these reasons, the proposed rezoning is anticipated to result <br />in development that is compatible with surrounding property. <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of <br />the comprehensive plan. Rezonings must also be consistent with the <br />overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future Land Use <br />Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, <br />conservation, and commercial and industrial land uses and their <br />densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in <br />nodes throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of <br />the comprehensive plan. Policies are statements in the plan which <br />identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct <br />the community's development. As courses of action committed to by <br />the county, policies provide the basis for all county land <br />development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are <br />important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing <br />rezoning requests. Of particular applicability for this request is <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15. <br />53 <br />August 12, 1997 <br />BOOK 104, PAGE 2 i 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.