My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/8/1997
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1997
>
9/8/1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:19 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 10:08:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
000K ' FAG€, <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed the purpose of the meeting and explained that <br />it involved the Land Development Regulations and landscaping countywide. He then <br />reviewed the issues as enumerated on the following Workshop Discussion Outline. <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />Private Sector Requirements: LDRs, Policies & Practices <br />A. Current & Pending Ordinance Landscape LDRs <br />B. Additional Possibilities <br />(1) Pre -C.0. inspection for plant quality <br />(2) Allowances for a shorter "pruned height" <br />(3) Allowances for trading -off sizes for quantities <br />(4) FP&L concerns: protecting overhead utility lines <br />C. Maintenance & Enforcement: current re -inspection policy <br />Public Sector Policies: Landscaping Within Public Rights -of -Way <br />A. Expectations <br />(1) SR 60 Corridor Plan: example of public sector expectations <br />(2) County -wide expectations: typical landscape guidelines for selected roads <br />a. Major urban road sections <br />b. Major rural road sections <br />C. Major urban roads in residential areas (street tree option) <br />B. Cost of Installation & Maintenance <br />(1) Comparison of installation and maintenance estimated costs <br />(2) Installation and maintenance obligations and funding <br />C. Implementation: <br />(1) Require landscaping improvements to be factored into the design of major <br />roadway projects <br />(2) Designing for future utility uses and changes. <br />D. Designating specific corridors for right-of-way landscaping: <br />(1) Major urban and rural roads/entrances: US 1, SR 60, CR 512, CR 510. <br />(2) Major urban roads in developed residential areas (e.g. 43rd Avenue). <br />Corridor Planning Approaches <br />A. Define all corridors, create task forces, 9-12 month workshop/plan effort. <br />B. Define all corridors, apply "generic" corridor plan requirements <br />(1) Apply Wabasso requirements to all corridors, or <br />(2) Apply SR 60 requirements to all corridors, or <br />(3) Apply a mixture of Wabasso and SR 60 plan elements <br />C. Define all corridors, staff presents a plan, adjustments made through a limited <br />number of workshops. <br />D. No more corridor plans: merely apply enhanced landscaping LDRs and public <br />right-of-way special landscaping on selected roads. <br />*Note: no architectural, sign, color, or special screening requirements would <br />apply. <br />12 <br />September 8, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.