Laserfiche WebLink
ON MOTION by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by a 4-0 vote (Commissioner <br />Macht being absent) unanimously authorized staff to proceed <br />with the bidding and construction of the project as outlined <br />in the Memorandum, as recommended by staff. <br />(CLERK'S NOTE: At the conclusion of Item I I.H.3, the Chairman was asked to hear Item <br />I I.H.5. out of order. For purposes of continuity, these minutes are written as items appear <br />on the Agenda.) <br />11.H.4. UTILITY RATE CONSULTANT PROPOSALS - RANKING <br />(CLERK'S NOTE: At the conclusion of Item 7.F, the Chairman called for Item I LHA. out <br />of order. For purposes of continuity, these minutes are written as items appear on the <br />Agenda.) <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of October 16, 1997: <br />TO: James _handier <br />ounry Administrator <br />FROM: James W. Davis, F.E. <br />Public Works Director— j;✓ <br />SUBJECT: Water and Wastewater Rate Consultant Selection <br />DATE: October 16, 1997 <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />The Utility Advisory Committee has evaluated the Water and <br />Wastewater Rate Consultant applicants and attached is the ranking <br />sheet. The prioritized ranking is as follows: <br />1. Camp, Dresser and McKee <br />2. Hartman and Associates <br />3. Burton & Associates <br />4. Holmlin Engineering <br />5. Public Resources Management Group <br />6. Glace and Radcliffe <br />• 11 D . • <br />Staff requests the Board to accept the ranking as submitted, and <br />proceed to interview the top three (3) ranked consultants. <br />OCTOBER 21, 1997 <br />