Laserfiche WebLink
600K 10i FAGL � " <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of November 26, 1997: <br />TO: Board of County Commissioners <br />THRU: James E. Chandler, County Administrator <br />FROM: Beth Jordan, Risk Manager_, <br />DATE: 26 November 1997 <br />SUBJECT: Public Hearing; Zuckerman vs. Indian River County <br />On November 25, 1997, the staff Claims Review Committee met to discuss the claim of Romana <br />Zuckerman. <br />Background <br />On October 15, 1995, Mrs. Zuckerman, then 33 years old, was injured in a two -vehicle accident at the <br />Intersection of 86th Avenue and 49th Street. A copy of the Florida Highway Patrol's Florida Traffic Crash <br />Report is attached. The plaintiffs husband, Alan, was charged with violation of right of way after driving his <br />car into the path of an oncoming vehicle. <br />Analysis <br />William Frates, Mrs. Zuckerman's attorney, made an initial demand of $75,000.00. On November 10, <br />Lyman Reynolds, defense counsel.. and I participated in mediation with Gene Roddenberry, mediator, the <br />plaintiff, her husband, and Mr. Fnates, who acknowledged that his client's husband was as much as 50% <br />responsible for the accident He maintained, however, that the County was at least 50% liable based upon <br />weeftgrasses which blocked Mr. Zudkemnan's sight distance. We have determined that Road S Bridge <br />maintains the shoulders of this intersection and had art the grass up to the canal guardrail, a distance of <br />approximately 9 % feet from the edge of pavement. Our accident reconstruction expert witness has advised <br />this is not a dear case for either party, bid one which could have been explained to a jury. The grass behind <br />the guardrail, growing directly along the canal bank, was overgrown and photographs taken by the plaintiffs <br />mother on the date of the accident show this condition. <br />At the mediation conference, Mr. Reynolds and staff held firm that this claim is not valued at over $15,000.00 <br />for settlement purposes and that we could not recommend a higher amount to the County. The claims <br />review process, including public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, was explained to the <br />plaintiff. This claim was scheduled for the December 8 trial docket After a few hours, Mrs. Zuckerman <br />agreed to our final offer. <br />The Claims Review Committee unanimously approved the mediated settlement based upon the following <br />fads. There was sigriftant Impact to Ants. Zuckerman's vehicle as evidenced by the attached photographs. <br />She has approximately $13,500.00 remaining in outstanding medical bilis atter payments by both her auto <br />insurer and group health insurer. Additionally, she continues to incur costa for a pain management clinic, <br />faces possible surgery, and has temporomandibular joint (TMJ) injury. Despite the fact that the water <br />management district owns the canal along 66th Avenue, the County has responsibility to maintain sight <br />distance and has traditionally maintained the roadways adjacent to canals. The County had received two <br />complaints about overgrown weeds at this intersection, and through a miscommunication, alt the weeds at <br />a nearby intersection but not at this one just prior to the accident. <br />Recommendation <br />This mediated settlement Is within the settlement authority of the Staff Claims Review Committee. In <br />keeping with the Boards desire that all such settlements appear as public items, it has been publicly noticed <br />and is being placed on this agenda. <br />DECEMBER 16, 1997 <br />-14- <br />