Laserfiche WebLink
Ir <br />BOOK 104 PAGE 2 <br />Planning Director Stan Boling reviewed a Memorandum of December 16, 1997: <br />TO: James Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIVWN HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Ro ert . Keating, CP <br />Community Development Direct <br />,4. /sI*, <br />FROM: Stan Boling, AICP <br />Planning Director <br />DATE: December 16, 1997 <br />SUBJECT: Proposed Change to the Grand Harbor DRI Development Order <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of January 6, 1998. <br />DESCRIPTION & CONDITIONS: <br />On October 23, 1985, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a development order (D.O.) <br />approving the development of regional impact (DRI) known as Grand Harbor. Over the last 12 years, <br />several amendments were approved that modified the original D.O. The amended D.O. remains in <br />effect and governs the general development of the entire project via specific D.O. conditions and <br />approved application materials that include a project master plan (land use) map (see attachment #2). <br />Much of the project is complete or under construction, although only about one fourth of the total <br />maximum allowable residential units have been built to date. <br />The requested D.O. amendment involves two changes, as follows: <br />1. Amend the project master plan regarding the "Office Parcel" and "Shopping Center Tract" <br />located between Indian River Boulevard and US 1 along the project entrance road (see <br />attachment #1). The current master plan allows office and commercial uses on these tracts. <br />The proposed change would allow residential as well as office and commercial uses on these <br />tracts. <br />2. The current build -out date for the overall project is December 31, 2000. The proposed <br />change would extend that date to December 30, 2005. <br />These proposed changes have been reviewed by county staff; the state (DCA - Department of <br />Community Affairs) and the regional planning council (TCRPC). The applicant has addressed <br />comments from county, TCRPC, and DCA staff. No development or agency indicates an objection <br />to approval of the request. The proposed changes have also been reviewed by the Planning and <br />Zoning Commission. At its meeting of December 11, 1997, the Planning and Zoning Commission <br />voted 7-0 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request (see <br />attachment #3). <br />18 <br />January 6, 1998 <br />0 40 <br />